Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of sulphur on yield and its uptake in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and their residual effect on succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Y.P. SINGH; S.C. SHARMA; J.S. MAAN

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1998-2000 to study the effect of sulphur on pod yield and S uptake in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and their residual effect on succeeding wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) using 8 soils of old alluvial plains of Tonk district of Rajasthan. Application of S Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha gave 18.8, 27.5 and 29.2% higher pod yield over the control in all the soils. Among the soils, maximum pod yield of groundnut was recorded in sandy-loam soil (14.57 qlha) followed by loamy sand (14.02 qlha) and sandy soil (13.19 qlha). The S uptake by pods increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur and maximum uptake (10.89 kglha) was noticed with application of 60 kg Slha. Residual effect of sulphur Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha appli- cation increased the grain yield of wheat by 10.4, 20.7 and 22.4%, respectively, over the control. Similar trend was found in straw yield of wheat. Residual effect of sulphur also increased the S uptake by wheat significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 20 increased groundnut pod yield by 18.8%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
20e1
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
18.8e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of S Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha gave 18.8, 27.5 and 29.2% higher pod yield over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 40 increased groundnut pod yield by 27.5%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
40e1
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
27.5e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of S Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha gave 18.8, 27.5 and 29.2% higher pod yield over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 60 increased groundnut pod yield by 29.2%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
60e1
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
29.2e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of S Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha gave 18.8, 27.5 and 29.2% higher pod yield over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut pod yield on sandy-loam soil was 14.57 qlha.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
14.57 qlhae1
Setting
sandy-loam soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum pod yield of groundnut was recorded in sandy-loam soil (14.57 qlha) followed by loamy sand (14.02 qlha) and sandy soil (13.19 qlha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut pod yield on loamy sand was 14.02 qlha.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
14.02 qlhae1
Setting
loamy sande1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum pod yield of groundnut was recorded in sandy-loam soil (14.57 qlha) followed by loamy sand (14.02 qlha) and sandy soil (13.19 qlha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut pod yield on sandy soil was 13.19 qlha.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
13.19 qlhae1
Setting
sandy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum pod yield of groundnut was recorded in sandy-loam soil (14.57 qlha) followed by loamy sand (14.02 qlha) and sandy soil (13.19 qlha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–572 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur uptake by pods increased significantly with sulphur level.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Organ / stage
podse1
Treatment
levels of sulphure1
Outcome
S uptake by podse1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“S uptake by pods increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur and maximum uptake (10.89 kglha) was noticed with application of 60 kg Slha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod sulphur uptake peaked at 10.89 kglha with 60 kg Slha.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
60 kg Slhae1
Outcome
S uptake by podse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
10.89 kglhae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“S uptake by pods increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur and maximum uptake (10.89 kglha) was noticed with application of 60 kg Slha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual sulphur at 20 increased wheat grain yield by 10.4%.

Treatment
20e1
Outcome
grain yield of wheate1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10.4e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residual effect of sulphur Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha appli- cation increased the grain yield of wheat by 10.4, 20.7 and 22.4%, respectively, over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual sulphur at 40 increased wheat grain yield by 20.7%.

Treatment
40e1
Outcome
grain yield of wheate1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20.7e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residual effect of sulphur Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha appli- cation increased the grain yield of wheat by 10.4, 20.7 and 22.4%, respectively, over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual sulphur at 60 increased wheat grain yield by 22.4%.

Treatment
60e1
Outcome
grain yield of wheate1
Direction
increasede1
Value
22.4e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residual effect of sulphur Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha appli- cation increased the grain yield of wheat by 10.4, 20.7 and 22.4%, respectively, over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual sulphur increased wheat straw yield similarly.

Treatment
Residual effect of sulphure1
Outcome
straw yield of wheate2
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residual effect of sulphur Q 20, 40 and 60 kglha appli- cation increased the grain yield of wheat by 10.4, 20.7 and 22.4%, respectively, over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similar trend was found in straw yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual sulphur significantly increased wheat sulphur uptake.

Treatment
Residual effect of sulphure1
Outcome
S uptake by wheate1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residual effect of sulphur also increased the S uptake by wheat significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1011 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.