Paper · 1993 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Modelling the effects of timing and rates of application of benzyladenine as a secondary thinner of ‘Fuji’ apple after ethephon

Sally A. Bound; K. M. Jones; B. Graham; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A trial on ‘Fuji’ apples at the Grove Research Station in southern Tasmania during the 1991/92 season studied the thinning effect and interactions between ethephon and benzyladenine (BA) when BA was applied as a secondary thinner after a full bloom (FB) application of ethephon. The spray treatments were a factorial combination of eight application times of BA (11,13,15,17,19, 21, 23 or 25 days after full bloom (AFB)) with ten concentrations (20,40,60,80,100,120,140,160,180 or 200 mg I“1). An unsprayed control and an ethephon control were included. Target thinning results were achieved 19- 23 d AFB with concentrations of 140-160 mg I“1. A corollary of this successful thinning was an increase in fruit weight and size. Return bloom was improved significantly where thinning was successful. There was no effect on fruit firmness, soluble solids or lateral branching. Drawbacks were an increase in the incidence of russet and a reduction in pip number at the optimum thinning times and concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA applied 19-23 days after full bloom at 140-160 mg I“1 achieved target thinning in Fuji apples.

Treatment
BAe2
Outcome
Target thinning resultse1
Value
140-160 mg I“1e1
Setting
Grove Research Station in southern Tasmaniae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A trial on ‘Fuji’ apples at the Grove Research Station in southern Tasmania during the 1991/92 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Target thinning results were achieved 19- 23 d AFB with concentrations of 140-160 mg I“1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–642 · show in text ↑
e2

“when BA was applied as a secondary thinner after a full bloom (FB) application of ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successful thinning increased fruit weight and size.

Organ / stage
fruite3
Treatment
successful thinninge3
Outcome
fruit weight and sizee3
Direction
increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A trial on ‘Fuji’ apples at the Grove Research Station in southern Tasmania during the 1991/92 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A corollary of this successful thinning was an increase in fruit weight and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Return bloom was improved significantly where thinning was successful.

Treatment
thinninge4
Outcome
Return bloome4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A trial on ‘Fuji’ apples at the Grove Research Station in southern Tasmania during the 1991/92 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Return bloom was improved significantly where thinning was successful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA had no effect on fruit firmness, soluble solids or lateral branching.

Treatment
BAe2
Outcome
fruit firmness, soluble solids or lateral branchinge5
Direction
no effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A trial on ‘Fuji’ apples at the Grove Research Station in southern Tasmania during the 1991/92 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“when BA was applied as a secondary thinner after a full bloom (FB) application of ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–277 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no effect on fruit firmness, soluble solids or lateral branching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum thinning times and concentrations increased the incidence of russet in apples.

Treatment
optimum thinning times and concentrationse6
Outcome
incidence of russete6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A trial on ‘Fuji’ apples at the Grove Research Station in southern Tasmania during the 1991/92 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“Drawbacks were an increase in the incidence of russet and a reduction in pip number at the optimum thinning times and concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum thinning times and concentrations reduced pip number in apples.

Treatment
optimum thinning times and concentrationse6
Outcome
pip numbere6
Direction
reductione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A trial on ‘Fuji’ apples at the Grove Research Station in southern Tasmania during the 1991/92 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“Drawbacks were an increase in the incidence of russet and a reduction in pip number at the optimum thinning times and concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1005 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pruning · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 16 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.