Paper · 2023 · Applied Biosciences

Determination of Target Crop Loads for Maximising Fruit Quality and Return Bloom in Several Apple Cultivars

Sally A. Bound

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In apple (Malus domestica), the level and timing of crop load have a major impact on the final fruit size and can also play a role in optimising internal fruit quality. Ideal crop loads vary with cultivar, but very few cultivars have recommended crop load targets that consider the effect of crop load on both return bloom and fruit quality. To address this issue, studies examining a range of crop loads and thinning times were undertaken on several apple cultivars. Return bloom and multiple fruit quality parameters were examined. The results of these studies demonstrate positive effects for early thinning, not only on fruit size but also on firmness and soluble solids content. Early-thinned fruit showed higher sugar levels than late-thinned fruit. Previously undemonstrated positive relationships between fruit sugar content and weight and between fruit firmness and weight in both ‘Fuji’ and ‘Delicious’, as well as between fruit sugar content and fruit firmness in ‘Delicious’, indicate that early thinning is a valuable tool in improving fruit quality. The current target crop load recommendations of 4–6 fruit cm−2 trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) for ‘Fuji’ and 2–4 fruit cm−2 TCSA for ‘Delicious’ are confirmed by this study. New recommendations are proposed for the other cultivars in this study taking into account the impact of crop load on both fruit quality and return bloom. Both ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Gala’ can support crop loads of up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without impacting return bloom, but fruit quality is compromised; hence, lower targets in the range of 4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSA are recommended. Large fruit size and good return bloom can be maintained in ‘Jonagold’ at crop loads of eight fruit cm−2 TCSA, while crop loads of four fruit cm−2 TCSA are suggested for ‘Braeburn’ to sustain regular bearing and good fruit size.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early thinning improved fruit size, firmness and soluble solids content.

Treatment
early thinninge0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive effects for early thinning, not only on fruit size but also on firmness and soluble solids content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-thinned fruit had higher sugar levels than late-thinned fruit.

Treatment
Early-thinnede0
Outcome
sugar levelse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
late-thinnede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early-thinned fruit showed higher sugar levels than late-thinned fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit sugar content was positively related to fruit weight in Fuji and Delicious.

Material
‘Fuji’ and ‘Delicious’e0
Outcome
fruit sugar content and weighte0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive relationships between fruit sugar content and weight and between fruit firmness and weight in both ‘Fuji’ and ‘Delicious’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness was positively related to weight in Fuji and Delicious.

Material
‘Fuji’ and ‘Delicious’e0
Outcome
fruit firmness and weighte0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive relationships between fruit sugar content and weight and between fruit firmness and weight in both ‘Fuji’ and ‘Delicious’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit sugar content was positively related to firmness in Delicious.

Material
‘Delicious’e0
Outcome
fruit sugar content and fruit firmnesse0
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between fruit sugar content and fruit firmness in ‘Delicious’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“positive relationships”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The existing Fuji crop load target of 4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSA was confirmed.

Material
‘Fuji’e0
Outcome
target crop load recommendationse0
Value
4–6 fruit cm−2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The current target crop load recommendations of 4–6 fruit cm−2 trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) for ‘Fuji’ and 2–4 fruit cm−2 TCSA for ‘Delicious’ are confirmed by this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The existing Delicious target of 2–4 fruit cm−2 TCSA was confirmed.

Material
‘Delicious’e0
Outcome
target crop load recommendationse0
Value
2–4 fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The current target crop load recommendations of 4–6 fruit cm−2 trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) for ‘Fuji’ and 2–4 fruit cm−2 TCSA for ‘Delicious’ are confirmed by this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pink Lady supported up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without affecting return bloom.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
without impactinge0
Value
eight fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Gala’ can support crop loads of up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without impacting return bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gala supported up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without affecting return bloom.

Material
‘Gala’e0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
without impactinge0
Value
eight fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Gala’ can support crop loads of up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without impacting return bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality was compromised at eight fruit cm−2 TCSA in Pink Lady.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
compromisede0
Value
eight fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Gala’ can support crop loads of up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without impacting return bloom, but fruit quality is compromised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality was compromised at eight fruit cm−2 TCSA in Gala.

Material
‘Gala’e0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
compromisede0
Value
eight fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Gala’ can support crop loads of up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without impacting return bloom, but fruit quality is compromised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A target of 4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSA was recommended for Pink Lady.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Outcome
lower targetse0
Value
4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Gala’ can support crop loads of up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without impacting return bloom, but fruit quality is compromised; hence, lower targets in the range of 4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSA are recommended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A target of 4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSA was recommended for Gala.

Material
‘Gala’e0
Outcome
lower targetse0
Value
4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ‘Pink Lady’ and ‘Gala’ can support crop loads of up to eight fruit cm−2 TCSA without impacting return bloom, but fruit quality is compromised; hence, lower targets in the range of 4–6 fruit cm−2 TCSA are recommended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold maintained large fruit and good return bloom at eight fruit cm−2 TCSA.

Material
‘Jonagold’e0
Outcome
Large fruit size and good return bloome0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
eight fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large fruit size and good return bloom can be maintained in ‘Jonagold’ at crop loads of eight fruit cm−2 TCSA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Four fruit cm−2 TCSA was suggested for Braeburn to sustain regular bearing and fruit size.

Material
‘Braeburn’e0
Outcome
regular bearing and good fruit sizee0
Value
four fruit cm−2 TCSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop loads of four fruit cm−2 TCSA are suggested for ‘Braeburn’ to sustain regular bearing and good fruit size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.