Paper · 1983 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Five Years of Machine Pruning: A Grower's Experience

GARY B. WILSON

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In 1978, test plots were established to evaluate machine pruning of Salvador, Barbera, and French Colombard grapes. A vineyard pruning machine was developed. Yields and sugars were collected for three harvest seasons. All tests but one showed increased yields and reduced sugars. Total sugar produced in the three years was increased 6% in Salvador, 13% in Barbera, and 7% in French Colombard. The labor costs of pruning complete blocks of the same varieties were collected as they progressed from hand pruning (1977) to machine aided (1978-80) to machine pruning (1981-82). Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period. Total pruning costs were also reduced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Machine pruning increased grape yields in all but one test.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
machine pruninge2
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
All tests but onee0
Comparator
hand pruninge2

Verbatim

e0

“All tests but one showed increased yields and reduced sugars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Machine pruning reduced grape sugars in all but one test.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
machine pruninge2
Outcome
sugarse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
All tests but onee0
Comparator
hand pruninge2

Verbatim

e0

“All tests but one showed increased yields and reduced sugars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar produced increased 6% in Salvador.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Salvadore0
Treatment
machine pruninge2
Outcome
Total sugar producede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
hand pruninge2

Verbatim

e0

“Total sugar produced in the three years was increased 6% in Salvador, 13% in Barbera, and 7% in French Colombard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar produced increased 13% in Barbera.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Barberae0
Treatment
machine pruninge2
Outcome
Total sugar producede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
hand pruninge2

Verbatim

e0

“Total sugar produced in the three years was increased 6% in Salvador, 13% in Barbera, and 7% in French Colombard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar produced increased 7% in French Colombard.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
French Colombarde0
Treatment
machine pruninge2
Outcome
Total sugar producede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
hand pruninge2

Verbatim

e0

“Total sugar produced in the three years was increased 6% in Salvador, 13% in Barbera, and 7% in French Colombard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs despite increasing wage rates.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Machine pruninge0
Outcome
hand pruning labor costse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
hand pruninge0

Verbatim

e0

“Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total pruning costs declined with machine pruning.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
machine pruninge2
Outcome
Total pruning costse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
hand pruninge2

Verbatim

e0

“Total pruning costs were also reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–733 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Machine pruning substantially reduced hand pruning labor costs even though wage rates increased during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.