Paper · 1987 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

The Influence of Girdling and Gibberellic Acid Application at Fruitset on Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless Grapes

D. C. Harrell; L. E. Williams

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
41
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of girdling and gibberellic acid (GA) on berry weight, soluble solids concentration, and yield of Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless table grapes were determined. Treatments included trunk girdling and GA application (40 mg/L) to entire vines, shoots only, or clusters only at fruitset. Berry growth and development were monitored several times between fruitset and harvest. Girdling increased berry weight approximately 0.8 g for both cultivars. GA applied to entire vines or to clusters only significantly (p < 0.01) increased berry weight of Ruby Seedless vines by 0.26 and 0.56 g over the control. Girdling reduced the soluble solids concentration at harvest by 0.8°Brix. Soluble solids of GA vine-, shoot-, and cluster-sprayed fruit were equal to or above the control. Vine yields were significantly (p < 0.01) increased by girdling. The number of clusters on Ruby Seedless grapevines were reduced to 54 per vine the following spring on treatments that had GA sprayed on the shoots, as compared to 82 clusters per vine for the control. Results demonstrated that the berry weight of Ruby Seedless vines could be increased by girdling and GA treatments at fruitset.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased berry weight by about 0.8 g in both cultivars.

Taxon
Grapest0
Material
Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedlesst0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
berry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.8 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling increased berry weight approximately 0.8 g for both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA applied to entire Ruby Seedless vines increased berry weight by 0.26 g over control.

Taxon
Ruby Seedlesse0
Treatment
GA applied to entire vinese0
Outcome
berry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.26e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“GA applied to entire vines or to clusters only significantly (p < 0.01) increased berry weight of Ruby Seedless vines by 0.26 and 0.56 g over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA applied to Ruby Seedless clusters increased berry weight by 0.56 g over control.

Taxon
Ruby Seedlesse0
Treatment
clusters onlye0
Outcome
berry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.56 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“GA applied to entire vines or to clusters only significantly (p < 0.01) increased berry weight of Ruby Seedless vines by 0.26 and 0.56 g over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling reduced soluble solids concentration at harvest by 0.8°Brix.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
soluble solids concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.8°Brixe0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling reduced the soluble solids concentration at harvest by 0.8°Brix.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA sprayed on vines produced fruit soluble solids equal to or above control.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
GA vine-e0
Outcome
Soluble solidse0
Direction
equal to or abovee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble solids of GA vine-, shoot-, and cluster-sprayed fruit were equal to or above the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA sprayed on shoots produced fruit soluble solids equal to or above control.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
shoot-e0
Outcome
Soluble solidse0
Direction
equal to or abovee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble solids of GA vine-, shoot-, and cluster-sprayed fruit were equal to or above the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA sprayed on clusters produced fruit soluble solids equal to or above control.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
cluster-sprayede0
Outcome
Soluble solidse0
Direction
equal to or abovee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble solids of GA vine-, shoot-, and cluster-sprayed fruit were equal to or above the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling significantly increased vine yield.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
Vine yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Vine yields were significantly (p < 0.01) increased by girdling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA spraying on Ruby Seedless shoots reduced following-spring clusters to 54 per vine versus 82 in control.

Taxon
Ruby Seedlesse0
Treatment
GA sprayed on the shootse0
Outcome
number of clusterse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54 per vinee0
Qualifier
82 clusters per vinee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of clusters on Ruby Seedless grapevines were reduced to 54 per vine the following spring on treatments that had GA sprayed on the shoots, as compared to 82 clusters per vine for the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1053 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.