Abstract
The effect of cane girdling, in combination with the common commercial practices of gibberellic acid applications and/or other crop control, on vine size and fruit characteristics was measured over 3 years for `Himrod' grapevines (Vitis ×labruscana × V. vinifera) grown in central New York state. Cane girdles 4 mm wide between the second and third node from the base of each fruiting cane resulted in vines that were capable of sustaining vine size while enhancing several aspects of fruit quality. When added to several vine-manipulation regimes, cane girdling increased cluster weight as much as 106%, berries per cluster as much as 138%, and berry weight as much as 17%. Although cane girdling increased yield as much as 66%, it consistently reduced fruit soluble solids concentration (SSC). Therefore, for cane girdling to contribute to sustained production of quality `Himrod' table grapes in a cool-growing-season climate, it will be necessary to practice it in combination with a level of crop control that will ensure acceptable fruit SSC.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Cane girdling increased Himrod cluster weight by as much as 106% in central New York.
- Material
- `Himrod'e0
- Treatment
- cane girdlinge2
- Outcome
- cluster weighte2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 106%e2
- Setting
- central New York statee0
VitisNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of cane girdling, in combination with the common commercial practices of gibberellic acid applications and/or other crop control, on vine size and fruit characteristics was measured over 3 years for `Himrod' grapevines (Vitis ×labruscana × V. vinifera) grown in central New York state”
e2“When added to several vine-manipulation regimes, cane girdling increased cluster weight as much as 106%, berries per cluster as much as 138%, and berry weight as much as 17%”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane girdling increased berries per cluster by as much as 138% in Himrod grapevines.
- Material
- `Himrod'e0
- Treatment
- cane girdlinge2
- Outcome
- berries per clustere2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 138%e2
- Setting
- central New York statee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of cane girdling, in combination with the common commercial practices of gibberellic acid applications and/or other crop control, on vine size and fruit characteristics was measured over 3 years for `Himrod' grapevines (Vitis ×labruscana × V. vinifera) grown in central New York state”
e2“When added to several vine-manipulation regimes, cane girdling increased cluster weight as much as 106%, berries per cluster as much as 138%, and berry weight as much as 17%”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane girdling increased berry weight by as much as 17% in Himrod grapevines.
- Material
- `Himrod'e0
- Treatment
- cane girdlinge2
- Outcome
- berry weighte2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 17%e2
- Setting
- central New York statee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of cane girdling, in combination with the common commercial practices of gibberellic acid applications and/or other crop control, on vine size and fruit characteristics was measured over 3 years for `Himrod' grapevines (Vitis ×labruscana × V. vinifera) grown in central New York state”
e2“When added to several vine-manipulation regimes, cane girdling increased cluster weight as much as 106%, berries per cluster as much as 138%, and berry weight as much as 17%”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane girdling increased yield by as much as 66% in Himrod grapevines.
- Material
- `Himrod'e0
- Treatment
- cane girdlinge3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 66%e3
- Setting
- central New York statee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of cane girdling, in combination with the common commercial practices of gibberellic acid applications and/or other crop control, on vine size and fruit characteristics was measured over 3 years for `Himrod' grapevines (Vitis ×labruscana × V. vinifera) grown in central New York state”
e3“Although cane girdling increased yield as much as 66%, it consistently reduced fruit soluble solids concentration (SSC)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane girdling consistently reduced fruit soluble solids concentration in Himrod grapevines.
- Material
- `Himrod'e0
- Treatment
- cane girdlinge3
- Outcome
- fruit soluble solids concentration (SSC)e3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Qualifier
- consistentlye3
- Setting
- central New York statee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of cane girdling, in combination with the common commercial practices of gibberellic acid applications and/or other crop control, on vine size and fruit characteristics was measured over 3 years for `Himrod' grapevines (Vitis ×labruscana × V. vinifera) grown in central New York state”
e3“Although cane girdling increased yield as much as 66%, it consistently reduced fruit soluble solids concentration (SSC)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane girdles 4 mm wide between the second and third node sustained vine size in Himrod grapevines.
- Material
- `Himrod'e0
- Treatment
- Cane girdles 4 mm wide between the second and third nodee1
- Outcome
- vine sizee1
- Direction
- sustaininge1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of cane girdling, in combination with the common commercial practices of gibberellic acid applications and/or other crop control, on vine size and fruit characteristics was measured over 3 years for `Himrod' grapevines (Vitis ×labruscana × V. vinifera) grown in central New York state”
e1“Cane girdles 4 mm wide between the second and third node from the base of each fruiting cane resulted in vines that were capable of sustaining vine size while enhancing several aspects of fruit quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane girdling must be combined with a level of crop control that ensures acceptable fruit SSC for sustained production of Himrod table grapes.
Verbatim
e4“Therefore, for cane girdling to contribute to sustained production of quality `Himrod' table grapes in a cool-growing-season climate, it will be necessary to practice it in combination with a level of crop control that will ensure acceptable fruit SSC”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →pruning · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.