Paper · 2015 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

Girdling improved berry coloration in summer but suppressed return growth in the following spring in 'Kyoho' grapevines cultivated in the subtropical double cropping system

Li, Kuo-Tan; Chang, Jer-Chia; Wang, Lee-Lien; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improving berry skin coloration is one of the major challenges in the tropical and subtropical viticulture. In this paper we aimed to document the effects of girdling at veraison on berry coloration and quality in grapevines on different rootstocks and we assessed the seasonal variations of girdling effects in the subtropical double cropping system. In the first experiment, gird-ling at veraison was tested in 'Kyoho' on 5C rootstocks. In the second experiment, own-rooted 'Kyoho', 5C or 1202C rootstocks were compared. Vines were trained to a horizontal overhead trellis with a single trunk and two short arms. One arm of each vine was girdled at veraison and the other arm served as the control. Girdling at veraison significantly improved skin color of berries from own-rooted vines or 5C rootstocks in the summer cropping cycle but was less effective in the winter cropping cycle. Girdling improved total soluble solids in own-rooted vines in the summer cropping cycle and in vines on 1202C in the winter cropping cycle. Girdling made in the winter cropping cycle did not completely heal until post-bloom in the following spring and reduced length of the fruiting shoot, number of leaves per shoot, and length of inflorescences of the next summer cropping cycle. We concluded that girdling at veraison is a good practice to improve berry color and quality for the summer cropping cycle but is not recommended for the winter cropping cycle.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling at veraison significantly improved summer berry skin color in own-rooted vines and was less effective in winter.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
own-rooted vinese0
Treatment
Girdling at veraisone0
Outcome
skin color of berriese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
summer cropping cycle but was less effective in the winter cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling at veraison significantly improved skin color of berries from own-rooted vines or 5C rootstocks in the summer cropping cycle but was less effective in the winter cropping cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling at veraison significantly improved summer berry skin color on 5C rootstocks and was less effective in winter.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
5Ce0
Treatment
Girdling at veraisone0
Outcome
skin color of berriese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
summer cropping cycle but was less effective in the winter cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling at veraison significantly improved skin color of berries from own-rooted vines or 5C rootstocks in the summer cropping cycle but was less effective in the winter cropping cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling improved total soluble solids in own-rooted vines in summer.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
own-rooted vinese0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
summer cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling improved total soluble solids in own-rooted vines in the summer cropping cycle and in vines on 1202C in the winter cropping cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling improved total soluble solids on 1202C in winter.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
1202Ce0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
winter cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling improved total soluble solids in own-rooted vines in the summer cropping cycle and in vines on 1202C in the winter cropping cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter girdling did not completely heal until post-bloom the following spring.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
Girdling made in the winter cropping cyclee0
Outcome
did not completely heal until post-bloom in the following springe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling made in the winter cropping cycle did not completely heal until post-bloom in the following spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter girdling reduced fruiting-shoot length, leaves per shoot and inflorescence length in the next summer cycle.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
Girdling made in the winter cropping cyclee0
Outcome
length of the fruiting shoot, number of leaves per shoot, and length of inflorescencese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
next summer cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling made in the winter cropping cycle did not completely heal until post-bloom in the following spring and reduced length of the fruiting shoot, number of leaves per shoot, and length of inflorescences of the next summer cropping cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling at veraison is recommended for summer berry color and quality.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
girdling at veraisone0
Qualifier
summer cropping cyclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We concluded that girdling at veraison is a good practice to improve berry color and quality for the summer cropping cycle but is not recommended for the winter cropping cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling at veraison is not recommended for winter cropping.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
girdling at veraisone0
Qualifier
not recommended for the winter cropping cyclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We concluded that girdling at veraison is a good practice to improve berry color and quality for the summer cropping cycle but is not recommended for the winter cropping cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.