Paper · 1998 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effects of girdling and covering mesh on ripening, colour and fruit characteristics of ‘Italia’ grapes

J. Carreño; S. Faraj; A. Martinez

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
30
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe effect of single and double girdling, and covering by mesh on the ripening, colour and fruit characteristics of ‘Italia’ grapes was examined. Three types of girdling were studied: girdling after fruit set, girdling at the beginning of ripening (veraison) and double girdling (girdling at fruit set + girdling at veraison). Girdling after fruit set significantly increased both berry weight and yield. Girdling at the beginning of ripening significantly increased soluble solids, the maturity index and berry colour, decreased titratable acidity and advanced fruit ripening by 5 d. Double girdling significantly increased berry weight and yield and produced the best results as regards soluble solids, maturity index, berry colour and earliness. Covering the vine with mesh delayed ripening by 9 d, decreased soluble solids, the maturity index and berry colour, although the yield was higher than that of the control because bunches were bigger and had more berries. Analysis of covariance showed that the delay in fruit ripening caused by mesh was not only due to an increase in yield but to other unmeasured factors probably associated with changes in microclimate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling after fruit set significantly increased berry weight and yield of Italia grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Girdling after fruit sete1
Outcome
berry weight and yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Girdling after fruit set significantly increased both berry weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling at the beginning of ripening significantly increased soluble solids, maturity index and berry colour of Italia grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Girdling at the beginning of ripeninge2
Outcome
soluble solids, the maturity index and berry coloure2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“Girdling at the beginning of ripening significantly increased soluble solids, the maturity index and berry colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling at the beginning of ripening decreased titratable acidity of Italia grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Girdling at the beginning of ripeninge2
Outcome
titratable aciditye3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“Girdling at the beginning of ripening significantly increased soluble solids, the maturity index and berry colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–525 · show in text ↑
e3

“decreased titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling at the beginning of ripening advanced fruit ripening of Italia grapes by 5 d.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Girdling at the beginning of ripeninge2
Outcome
fruit ripeninge4
Direction
advancede4
Value
5 de4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“Girdling at the beginning of ripening significantly increased soluble solids, the maturity index and berry colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–525 · show in text ↑
e4

“advanced fruit ripening by 5 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double girdling significantly increased berry weight and yield of Italia grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Double girdlinge5
Outcome
berry weight and yielde5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e5

“Double girdling significantly increased berry weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double girdling gave the best results for soluble solids, maturity index and berry colour of Italia grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Double girdlinge5
Outcome
soluble solids, maturity index, berry coloure6
Direction
best resultse6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e5

“Double girdling significantly increased berry weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–654 · show in text ↑
e6

“produced the best results as regards soluble solids, maturity index, berry colour and earliness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double girdling gave the best results for earliness of Italia grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Double girdlinge5
Outcome
earlinesse6
Direction
best resultse6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e5

“Double girdling significantly increased berry weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–654 · show in text ↑
e6

“produced the best results as regards soluble solids, maturity index, berry colour and earliness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Covering the vines with mesh delayed ripening of Italia grapes by 9 d.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Covering the vine with meshe7
Outcome
ripeninge7
Direction
delayede7
Value
9 de7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e7

“Covering the vine with mesh delayed ripening by 9 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Covering the vines with mesh decreased soluble solids, maturity index and berry colour of Italia grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Covering the vine with meshe1
Outcome
soluble solids, the maturity index and berry coloure1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Covering the vine with mesh delayed ripening by 9 d, decreased soluble solids, the maturity index and berry colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Covering the vines with mesh raised yield of Italia grapes above the control, because bunches were bigger and had more berries.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
Covering the vine with meshe1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
because bunches were bigger and had more berriese2
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Covering the vine with mesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–783 · show in text ↑
e2

“although the yield was higher than that of the control because bunches were bigger and had more berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–975 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mesh-delayed ripening was not only due to higher yield but also to other unmeasured factors, probably microclimate changes.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Italiae0
Treatment
meshe3
Outcome
delay in fruit ripeninge3
Qualifier
other unmeasured factors probably associated with changes in microclimatee3

Verbatim

e0

“of ‘Italia’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–138 · show in text ↑
e3

“the delay in fruit ripening caused by mesh was not only due to an increase in yield but to other unmeasured factors probably associated with changes in microclimate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1176 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

pruning · phenology · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

stage · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

stage · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.