Paper · 2010

Characterising the factors that affect germination and emergence in sugarcane.

M. A. Smit

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Good germination is a basic requirement for successful sugarcane production. To predict crop emergence and manage early crop development it is necessary to understand the factors that affect germination and early growth. The minimum temperature for bud germination used in the CANEGRO and APSIM crop models is 10°C, based on leaf emergence studies. As the base temperature for emergence for South African cultivars has not been documented previously, a study was initiated to examine the effect of temperature, soil moisture, soil fertility and seed lot on the emergence of cultivars NCo376, N16, N27 and non-fertilised N27. Carefully selected setts were planted in trays filled with soil of 0, 7 and 21% clay content, in glasshouse cubicles which were set at 30°C, 25°C, 20°C and 15°C, respectively. A set of planted trays was kept dry while the rest were irrigated according to evaporative demand. Bud emergence from a 60 mm planting depth peaked at 14, 22 and 56 days in the 30, 25 and 20°C cubicles, respectively. Germination in the 15°C environment was very poor and could not be used to determine base temperatures. Using linear extrapolation of the response to temperature, the results indicated that emergence did not take place below 18.1°C for NCo376, 17.8°C for N16 and 16.8°C for N27. Seedcane of unfertilised origin germinated significantly more poorly than that of fertilised origin and sets planted in fertilised soil demonstrated significantly higher emergence counts (p = 0.05) compared to unfertilised soil. Setts planted in sun-dried soil did not grow roots or show signs of bud swelling and differentiation.Results from this study may help explain the poor emergence under cool winter conditions or poor ratoonability experienced under trash. Results also indicated differences in cultivar sensitivity, and the methodology could be used to screen for better adaptation to the cooler Midlands or southern production areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud emergence peaked at 14 days at 30°C.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Bud emergencee0
Direction
peakede0
Value
14e0
Setting
30e0

Verbatim

e0

“Bud emergence from a 60 mm planting depth peaked at 14, 22 and 56 days in the 30, 25 and 20°C cubicles, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud emergence peaked at 22 days at 25°C.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Bud emergencee0
Direction
peakede0
Value
22e0

Verbatim

e0

“Bud emergence from a 60 mm planting depth peaked at 14, 22 and 56 days in the 30, 25 and 20°C cubicles, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud emergence peaked at 56 days at 20°C.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Bud emergencee0
Direction
peakede0
Value
56 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“Bud emergence from a 60 mm planting depth peaked at 14, 22 and 56 days in the 30, 25 and 20°C cubicles, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination at 15°C was very poor.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
very poore0
Setting
15°C environmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Germination in the 15°C environment was very poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NCo376 did not emerge below 18.1°C.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
NCo376e0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
did not take placee0
Value
18.1°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“emergence did not take place below 18.1°C for NCo376”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N16 did not emerge below 17.8°C.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
N16e0
Outcome
17.8°C for N16e0
Value
17.8°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“17.8°C for N16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N27 did not emerge below 16.8°C.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
N27e0
Outcome
16.8°C for N27e0
Value
16.8°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“16.8°C for N27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilised seedcane germinated significantly more poorly than fertilised seedcane.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
unfertilised origine0
Outcome
germinatede0
Direction
more poorlye0
Comparator
fertilised origine0

Verbatim

e0

“Seedcane of unfertilised origin germinated significantly more poorly than that of fertilised origin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilised soil increased emergence counts compared with unfertilised soil.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
fertilised soile0
Outcome
emergence countse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unfertilised soile0

Verbatim

e0

“sets planted in fertilised soil demonstrated significantly higher emergence counts (p = 0.05) compared to unfertilised soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Setts in sun-dried soil did not grow roots or show bud swelling and differentiation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sun-dried soile0
Outcome
did not grow roots or show signs of bud swelling and differentiatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Setts planted in sun-dried soil did not grow roots or show signs of bud swelling and differentiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The methodology could screen for adaptation to cooler production areas.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
screen for better adaptatione0
Setting
Midlandse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“the methodology could be used to screen for better adaptation to the cooler Midlands or southern production areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1941 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.