Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under integrated nutrient supply system in rainfed areas of Jammu

J.S. JAMWAL

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment in respect of integrated nutrient management in maize (Zea mays L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Poal.) cropping system was conducted during 2001-02 and 2002-03, at the Dryland Research Sub-Station, Jammu, to study the effect of different sources of nutrient supply, viz. organics and inorganics, in maize and the subsequent effect on succeeding wheat crop. The highest mean maize, wheat and wheat-equivalent yield of the system was recorded with the application of 10 tonnes FYM + 40 kg Nlha. Production efficiency in terms of rate of production per day as well as the benefit : cost ratio were also superior with this treat- ment. Application of organic manures also improved the nutrient status of the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 tonnes FYM plus 40 kg Nlha gave the highest mean maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
10 tonnes FYM + 40 kg Nlhae0
Outcome
maizee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean maize, wheat and wheat-equivalent yield of the system was recorded with the application of 10 tonnes FYM + 40 kg Nlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 tonnes FYM plus 40 kg Nlha gave the highest mean wheat yield.

Treatment
10 tonnes FYM + 40 kg Nlhae0
Outcome
wheate0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean maize, wheat and wheat-equivalent yield of the system was recorded with the application of 10 tonnes FYM + 40 kg Nlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave the highest wheat-equivalent system yield.

Treatment
10 tonnes FYM + 40 kg Nlhae0
Outcome
wheat-equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean maize, wheat and wheat-equivalent yield of the system was recorded with the application of 10 tonnes FYM + 40 kg Nlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment also had superior production efficiency.

Outcome
Production efficiencye0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Production efficiency in terms of rate of production per day as well as the benefit : cost ratio were also superior with this treat- ment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–664 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment also had a superior benefit-cost ratio.

Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Production efficiency in terms of rate of production per day as well as the benefit : cost ratio were also superior with this treat- ment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure improved soil nutrient status.

Treatment
organic manurese0
Outcome
nutrient status of the soile0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of organic manures also improved the nutrient status of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–742 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

fertilization · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 98 positive, 27 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.