Paper · 2007 · Annals of Agricultural Research

EFFECT OF CROPPING SYSTEMS, FERTILITY LEVELS AND MOISTURE CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF PEARLMILLET AND MOTHBEAN IN INTERCROPPING SYSTEM

J.P. Tetarwal; K.S. RANA

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment on moisture conservation and nutrient management studies in sole and intercropped pearlmillet under rainfed conditions was conducted during two consecutive kharif seasons of 2003 and 2004. The treatment combination comprised two cropping systems and three fertility levels in main plots and four moisture conservation practices. The results indicated that planting of one row of mothbean in between paired rows (30/70cm) of pearlmillet was superior over sole pearlmillet in respect of pearlmillet equivalent yield. Application of 40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ ha recorded higher growth and yield of pearlmillet under both sole and intercropping system as well as that of mothbean. Application of FYM @ 5t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch was found the best moisture conservation practice by recording higher growth and yield of pearlmillet as well as mothbean over rest of the moisture conservation practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping mothbean between paired pearlmillet rows gave higher pearlmillet equivalent yield than sole pearlmillet.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
planting of one row of mothbean in between paired rows (30/70cm) of pearlmillete0
Interactor
mothbeanVigna aconitifoliae0other
Outcome
pearlmillet equivalent yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
sole pearlmillete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · InteractorLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting of one row of mothbean in between paired rows (30/70cm) of pearlmillet was superior over sole pearlmillet in respect of pearlmillet equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer at 40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ ha increased pearlmillet growth and yield in sole and intercropped systems.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ hae0
Outcome
growth and yield of pearlmillete0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ ha recorded higher growth and yield of pearlmillet under both sole and intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer at 40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ ha increased mothbean growth and yield.

Treatment
40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ hae0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ ha recorded higher growth and yield of pearlmillet under both sole and intercropping system as well as that of mothbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM, dust mulch and straw mulch gave higher pearlmillet growth and yield than other moisture practices.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
FYM @ 5t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulche0
Outcome
growth and yield of pearlmillete0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the moisture conservation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @ 5t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch was found the best moisture conservation practice by recording higher growth and yield of pearlmillet as well as mothbean over rest of the moisture conservation practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM, dust mulch and straw mulch gave higher mothbean growth and yield than other moisture practices.

Treatment
FYM @ 5t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulche0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the moisture conservation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @ 5t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch was found the best moisture conservation practice by recording higher growth and yield of pearlmillet as well as mothbean over rest of the moisture conservation practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–916 · show in text ↑

Vigna aconitifolia · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

organic · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 65 positive, 1 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

organic · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.