Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FYM, dust mulch and straw mulch gave higher mothbean growth and yield than other moisture practices.

A claim from EFFECT OF CROPPING SYSTEMS, FERTILITY LEVELS AND MOISTURE CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF PEARLMILLET AND MOTHBEAN IN INTERCROPPING SYSTEM · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM, dust mulch and straw mulch gave higher mothbean growth and yield than other moisture practices.

Treatment
FYM @ 5t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulche0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the moisture conservation practicese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @ 5t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch was found the best moisture conservation practice by recording higher growth and yield of pearlmillet as well as mothbean over rest of the moisture conservation practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–916

Title

EFFECT OF CROPPING SYSTEMS, FERTILITY LEVELS AND MOISTURE CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF PEARLMILLET AND MOTHBEAN IN INTERCROPPING SYSTEM

J.P. Tetarwal; K.S. RANA Annals of Agricultural Research 2007

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-f88ba35e294315232f077677e6a1943f2429becbaa01f4a6b99b036ca4116952 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.