Paper · 2013 · Letopis naučnih radova Poljoprivrednog fakulteta

Optimal nitrogen fertilizer application rate in apple production on meadow black soil

Mihailo Milivojac

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper presents the analysis of the most important biological characteristics of apples (vegetative growth, yield potential, fruit yield and fruit quality), comparing three apple cultivars (Idared, Golden Delicious - Clone B and Wellspur) with M.9 rootstock. The analysis is done with respect to the optimal nitrogen nutrition and the optimal planting density. In order to determine the optimal amount of the nitrogen fertilizer, we used different rates in our experiment (N0, N1=150 kgNha-1, N2=200 kgNha-1, N3=300 kgNha-1). The dynamics of the soil mineral nitrogen was followed during the 24 months period, in the given pedo-climatic conditions, and all the changes in fruits during that time were analyzed. We calculated the mineralization capacity of the meadow black soil under apple trees on the basis of the soil mineral nitrogen content, and the amount taken out through yield and biomass. Based on this data, we provided the recommendations concerning the nitrogen fertilization norms under the similar agro-ecological conditions. The optimal nitrogen fertilizer application rate results in the regular growth and the regular yield from year to year. Also, the size, the quality and health safety of fruits are maximized, while the environment is protected from the nitrate leaching. The choice of the optimal planting density leads to the better utilization of the cultivar's genetic potential, climatic and soil potential, as well as human resources. It also ensures a long-term, continued production of a high quality yield, respecting all the natural potentials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal nitrogen application produces regular annual apple growth and yield.

Treatment
optimal nitrogen fertilizer application ratee0
Outcome
regular growth and the regular yielde0
Direction
regulare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal nitrogen fertilizer application rate results in the regular growth and the regular yield from year to year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal nitrogen application maximizes apple fruit size, quality and health safety.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer application ratet0
Outcome
size, the quality and health safety of fruitse0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the size, the quality and health safety of fruits are maximized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen fertilizer application rate in apple production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal nitrogen application protects against nitrate leaching.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer application ratet0
Outcome
nitrate leachinge0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the environment is protected from the nitrate leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen fertilizer application rate in apple production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal planting density improves utilization of genetic, climatic, soil and human resources.

Treatment
optimal planting densitye0
Outcome
better utilization of the cultivar's genetic potential, climatic and soil potential, as well as human resourcese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The choice of the optimal planting density leads to the better utilization of the cultivar's genetic potential, climatic and soil potential, as well as human resources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1466 · show in text ↑
e2

“characteristics of apples (vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal planting density ensures long-term high-quality apple production.

Treatment
optimal planting densitye1
Outcome
long-term, continued production of a high quality yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also ensures a long-term, continued production of a high quality yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“The choice of the optimal planting density leads to the better utilization of the cultivar's genetic potential, climatic and soil potential, as well as human resources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1466 · show in text ↑
e2

“characteristics of apples (vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–110 · show in text ↑

density · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.