Paper · 2019 · Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture

PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW

Polunina O. V.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the research of the effect of the bi-axis formation by means of budding and the plant density in a row on the output and quality of young bi-axis apple trees cv. Florina 54–118 and the economic efficiency of their cultivation. The research was carried out in the fruit nursery of the educational-production department of Uman national university of horticulture in the years of 2016–2018. Bi-axis formation was done by budding: one bud with a further shoot picking when it is 10 cm long (the control), one bud with a further shoot picking when it is 20 cm long, two buds opposite (hereinafter “opposite budding”), two buds opposite with their 5-cm shift to each other along a rootstock (hereinafter “alternate budding”). A rootstock was planted in a field of a nursery, the distances between plants being 33, 45, 55 і 65 cm. It was found out that opposite and alternate budding with two buds resulted in a maximum increase of the standard young tree output by 12 and 11 %, respectively. It was recorded that the lowest plant density, due to the increase of the distance between plants in a row up to 45, 55 і 65 cm, caused the decrease of the output of young trees per unit area by 23, 35 and 44 % (y = 0,004x2 - 0,628x + 32,72; ηxy = 0,99 ± 0,04), respectively. And, a lower plant density facilitated the increase of the share of quality crowned young bi-axis apple trees from the number of the planted rootstock by 6, 9 and 10 %. So, opposite budding with two buds and a plant density in a row equal to 33 cm between plants ensured the output of 17.7 thousand standard young trees per hectare, favored a maximum 13 %-decrease of cost production and 24 %-increase of the sales revenue. All this helped receive UAH 388 th. of net profit and 197 % of profitability. The largest share of standard young trees from the number of the planted rootstock was recorded under opposite (94 %) and alternate (93 %) budding with two buds and a 65 cm-distance between plants in a row.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opposite budding with two buds increased standard young tree output by 12%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
oppositee0
Outcome
standard young tree outpute0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“opposite and alternate budding with two buds resulted in a maximum increase of the standard young tree output by 12 and 11 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate budding with two buds increased standard young tree output by 11%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
alternate budding with two budse0
Outcome
standard young tree outpute0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“opposite and alternate budding with two buds resulted in a maximum increase of the standard young tree output by 12 and 11 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 45 cm row spacing, young tree output per unit area decreased by 23%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
45e0
Outcome
output of young trees per unit areae0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the distance between plants in a row up to 45, 55 і 65 cm, caused the decrease of the output of young trees per unit area by 23, 35 and 44 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 55 cm row spacing, young tree output per unit area decreased by 35%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
55e0
Outcome
output of young trees per unit areae0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
35e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the distance between plants in a row up to 45, 55 і 65 cm, caused the decrease of the output of young trees per unit area by 23, 35 and 44 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 65 cm row spacing, young tree output per unit area decreased by 44%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
65 cme0
Outcome
output of young trees per unit areae0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
44 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the distance between plants in a row up to 45, 55 і 65 cm, caused the decrease of the output of young trees per unit area by 23, 35 and 44 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower planting density increased the quality crowned tree share by 6%, 9%, and 10% at the three wider spacings.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
lower plant densitye0
Outcome
share of quality crowned young bi-axis apple treese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a lower plant density facilitated the increase of the share of quality crowned young bi-axis apple trees from the number of the planted rootstock by 6, 9 and 10 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1455 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opposite budding at 33 cm spacing yielded 17.7 thousand standard young trees per hectare.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
opposite budding with two budse0
Outcome
standard young trees per hectaree0
Value
17.7 thousande0
Setting
33 cm between plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“opposite budding with two buds and a plant density in a row equal to 33 cm between plants ensured the output of 17.7 thousand standard young trees per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That budding and spacing combination reduced production cost by 13%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
cost productione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
13 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“favored a maximum 13 %-decrease of cost production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That budding and spacing combination increased sales revenue by 24%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
sales revenuee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
24 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24 %-increase of the sales revenue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced UAH 388 thousand net profit.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
net profite0
Value
UAH 388 th.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UAH 388 th. of net profit and 197 % of profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced 197% profitability.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Value
197 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UAH 388 th. of net profit and 197 % of profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opposite budding at 65 cm spacing produced 94% standard young trees among planted rootstocks.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
oppositee0
Outcome
share of standard young treese0
Value
94 %e0
Setting
65 cm-distancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest share of standard young trees from the number of the planted rootstock was recorded under opposite (94 %) and alternate (93 %) budding with two buds and a 65 cm-distance between plants in a row.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1995 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate budding at 65 cm spacing produced 93% standard young trees among planted rootstocks.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
alternatee0
Outcome
share of standard young treese0
Value
93 %e0
Setting
65 cm-distancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest share of standard young trees from the number of the planted rootstock was recorded under opposite (94 %) and alternate (93 %) budding with two buds and a 65 cm-distance between plants in a row.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1995 · show in text ↑
t0

“PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GROWING YOUNG BI-AXIS APPLE TREES DEPENDING ON THE PRACTICE OF BI-AXIS FORMATION BY BUDDING AND THE DENSITY IN A ROW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑

density · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.