Abstract
The experiment was conducted at instructional farm of the Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, Rajasthan to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays L.) variety PEHM 2. The crop produced significantly higher number and weight/cob of grains, test weight and grain and stover yields with conjoin application of recommended dose of NPK + 10 t FYM/ha com- pared to either inorganic fertilizer alone or organic sources or 50% of recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers. Application of recommended dose of NPK along with seed inoculation of Azotobacter resulted in higher net returns and B:C ratio of maize crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Combined NPK and FYM increased number and weight/cob of grains versus alternative nutrient sources.
- Material
- PEHM 2e0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of NPK + 10 t FYM/hae2
- Outcome
- number and weight/cob of grainse2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- either inorganic fertilizer alone or organic sources or 50% of recommended dose of inorganic fertilizerse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maize (Zea mays L.) variety PEHM 2”
e2“The crop produced significantly higher number and weight/cob of grains, test weight and grain and stover yields with conjoin application of recommended dose of NPK + 10 t FYM/ha com- pared to either inorganic fertilizer alone or organic sources or 50% of recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined NPK and FYM increased test weight versus alternative nutrient sources.
- Material
- PEHM 2e0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of NPK + 10 t FYM/hae2
- Outcome
- test weighte2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- either inorganic fertilizer alone or organic sources or 50% of recommended dose of inorganic fertilizerse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maize (Zea mays L.) variety PEHM 2”
e2“The crop produced significantly higher number and weight/cob of grains, test weight and grain and stover yields with conjoin application of recommended dose of NPK + 10 t FYM/ha com- pared to either inorganic fertilizer alone or organic sources or 50% of recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined NPK and FYM increased grain and stover yields versus alternative nutrient sources.
- Material
- PEHM 2e0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of NPK + 10 t FYM/hae2
- Outcome
- grain and stover yieldse2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- either inorganic fertilizer alone or organic sources or 50% of recommended dose of inorganic fertilizerse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maize (Zea mays L.) variety PEHM 2”
e2“The crop produced significantly higher number and weight/cob of grains, test weight and grain and stover yields with conjoin application of recommended dose of NPK + 10 t FYM/ha com- pared to either inorganic fertilizer alone or organic sources or 50% of recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers.”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK with Azotobacter seed inoculation gave higher net returns and B:C ratio.
- Treatment
- recommended dose of NPK along with seed inoculation of Azotobactere2
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere2symbiont - Outcome
- net returns and B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“maize (Zea mays L.) variety PEHM 2”
e2“Application of recommended dose of NPK along with seed inoculation of Azotobacter resulted in higher net returns and B:C ratio of maize crop.”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
102 papers more in this group
See all 106 papers →inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
534 papers more in this group
See all 538 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.