Paper · 2011 · Journal of Food Legumes

Effect of foliar application of urea on growth, yield and quality of chickpea under rainfed conditions

V Venkatesh; P. S. Basu

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive winter seasons of 2006–07 and 2007–08 on Inceptisol at Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur to study the effect of foliar application of urea on chickpea under rainfed condition. Foliar application of urea apart from the basal application of recommended dose of fertilizers increased branching in chickpea by 8–23% over no spray or water spray. The highest grain yield and yield attributes were recorded with 2% urea spray at 75 days after sowing (DAS). The results also suggested that 2% foliar application of urea at 75 DAS significantly increased the seed size, leaf and seed nitrogen contents and also protein content of seeds. The increase in leaf nitrogen and protein content of seeds was significantly correlated with SPAD chlorophyll metre reading. The significant increase in the number of branches as a result of urea application also contributed towards overall biomass production under rainfed condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea increased branching by 8–23% relative to no spray or water spray.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Foliar application of ureae0
Outcome
branchinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8–23%e0
Comparator
no spray or water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of urea apart from the basal application of recommended dose of fertilizers increased branching in chickpea by 8–23% over no spray or water spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2% urea spray at 75 DAS produced the highest grain yield and yield attributes.

Treatment
2% urea spray at 75 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
grain yield and yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield and yield attributes were recorded with 2% urea spray at 75 days after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2% urea spray at 75 DAS significantly increased seed size.

Treatment
2% foliar application of urea at 75 DASe0
Outcome
seed sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“2% foliar application of urea at 75 DAS significantly increased the seed size, leaf and seed nitrogen contents and also protein content of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2% urea spray at 75 DAS significantly increased leaf and seed nitrogen contents.

Treatment
2% foliar application of urea at 75 DASe0
Outcome
leaf and seed nitrogen contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“2% foliar application of urea at 75 DAS significantly increased the seed size, leaf and seed nitrogen contents and also protein content of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2% urea spray at 75 DAS significantly increased seed protein content.

Treatment
2% foliar application of urea at 75 DASe0
Outcome
protein content of seedse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“2% foliar application of urea at 75 DAS significantly increased the seed size, leaf and seed nitrogen contents and also protein content of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–693 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen and seed protein contents significantly correlated with SPAD chlorophyll readings.

Outcome
leaf nitrogen and protein content of seedse0
Comparator
SPAD chlorophyll metre readinge0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in leaf nitrogen and protein content of seeds was significantly correlated with SPAD chlorophyll metre reading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–818 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased branching from urea application contributed to biomass production under rainfed conditions.

Treatment
urea applicatione0
Outcome
overall biomass productione0
Qualifier
increase in the number of branchese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The significant increase in the number of branches as a result of urea application also contributed towards overall biomass production under rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–978 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 69 positive, 4 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.