Paper · 2002 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integrated Weed Management in Cotton in Cotton-Wheat System

Vivek Vivek; Shailesh Tripathi; B. P. Dhyani

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons of 1996 and 1997. Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon, Trianthema monogyna, Cyperus iria and Panicum spp. were the dominant weeds. Out of 10 weed control treatments, when averaged over both the years, the maximum colton yield of 1140 kg ha−1 was obtained in hand weeding 30 and 60 DAS and was at par with pendimethalin 1 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DAS and alachlor 2 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DAS. Minimum cotton yield of 798 kg ha−1 was obtained in weedy check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 30 and 60 DAS gave the maximum cotton yield, 1140 kg/ha, among 10 weed control treatments averaged over two years.

Treatment
hand weeding 30 and 60 DASe1
Outcome
colton yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
1140 kg ha−1e1
Qualifier
averaged over both the yearse1
Comparator
weed control treatmentse1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“The field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons of 1996 and 1997”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Out of 10 weed control treatments, when averaged over both the years, the maximum colton yield of 1140 kg ha−1 was obtained in hand weeding 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha followed by hand weeding at 30 DAS gave cotton yield at par with hand weeding at 30 and 60 DAS.

Treatment
pendimethalin 1 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DASe2
Outcome
colton yielde1
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
hand weeding 30 and 60 DASe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Out of 10 weed control treatments, when averaged over both the years, the maximum colton yield of 1140 kg ha−1 was obtained in hand weeding 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–344 · show in text ↑
e2

“was at par with pendimethalin 1 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DAS and alachlor 2 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor 2 kg/ha followed by hand weeding at 30 DAS gave cotton yield at par with hand weeding at 30 and 60 DAS.

Treatment
alachlor 2 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DASe2
Outcome
colton yielde1
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
hand weeding 30 and 60 DASe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Out of 10 weed control treatments, when averaged over both the years, the maximum colton yield of 1140 kg ha−1 was obtained in hand weeding 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–344 · show in text ↑
e2

“was at par with pendimethalin 1 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DAS and alachlor 2 kg ha−1 fb hand weeding 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–457 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check gave the minimum cotton yield, 798 kg/ha.

Outcome
cotton yielde3
Value
798 kg ha−1e3
Qualifier
weedy checke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e3

“Minimum cotton yield of 798 kg ha−1 was obtained in weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–522 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

alachlor · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.