Abstract
Different nursery treatments alone and in combinations with spot application of aldicarb (Temik 5G) @ 1.0 kg a.i./ha and neem (Azadirachta indica) leaves @ 50 qts/ha in the field were evaluated for control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) infecting tomato (cv HS 101). Reduction of 48.9 and 26.7 per cent in nematode population was obtained in nursery treated with neem + spot application of aldicarb and nursery treated with neem + spot application of neem leaves respectively. Aldicarb treated nursery plus spot treatment with aldicarb at transplanting showed maximum reduction (62.3 per cent) in M. javanica population. However, use of uninfected tomato nursery + aldicarb treatment gave highest yield of 7.6 kg per plot (2.0 x 1.5 meters) in comparison to 4.7 kg in plots when infected tomato nursery was transplanted alone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Neem nursery treatment plus aldicarb spot application reduced nematode population by 48.9 percent.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- nursery treated with neem + spot application of aldicarbe0
- Outcome
- nematode populatione0
- Direction
- Reductione0
- Value
- 48.9 and 26.7 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Reduction of 48.9 and 26.7 per cent in nematode population was obtained in nursery treated with neem + spot application of aldicarb and nursery treated with neem + spot application of neem leaves respectively.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem nursery and neem leaf spot treatment reduced nematode population by 26.7 percent.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- nursery treated with neem + spot application of neem leavese0
- Outcome
- nematode populatione0
- Direction
- Reductione0
- Value
- 26.7 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Reduction of 48.9 and 26.7 per cent in nematode population was obtained in nursery treated with neem + spot application of aldicarb and nursery treated with neem + spot application of neem leaves respectively.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb nursery and transplant spot treatment gave maximum nematode reduction of 62.3 percent.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Aldicarb treated nursery plus spot treatment with aldicarb at transplantinge0
- Interactor
- M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
- Outcome
- M. javanica populatione0
- Direction
- maximum reductione0
- Value
- 62.3 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aldicarb treated nursery plus spot treatment with aldicarb at transplanting showed maximum reduction (62.3 per cent) in M. javanica population.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Uninfected tomato nursery plus aldicarb yielded 7.6 kg per plot versus 4.7 kg for infected nursery alone.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- uninfected tomato nursery + aldicarb treatmente0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 7.6 kg per plote0
- Qualifier
- 4.7 kge0
- Comparator
- infected tomato nursery was transplanted alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“use of uninfected tomato nursery + aldicarb treatment gave highest yield of 7.6 kg per plot (2.0 x 1.5 meters) in comparison to 4.7 kg in plots when infected tomato nursery was transplanted alone.”
The same questions in other papers
aldicarb · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →aldicarb · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →aldicarb · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Azadirachta indica · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →transplanting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →botanical · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →transplanting · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
transplanting · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.