Paper · 2006 · Pesticide Research Journal

Bioefficacy of Insecticides in Combination with Acaricides and Nutrients Against Helopeltis Theivorr Waterhouse in Tea

M. C. Sarmah; Ashikur Rahman; A. K. Phukan; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field investigations were carried out to generate base line data on bioefficacy of recommended insecticides for the control of tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora in combination with acaricides to combat the problem of mixed infestation of red spider mite and tea mosqqito bug in tea. The mixture of cypermethrin with propagite ana fenpyroximatea combinations of deltamethrin, alphamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, λ-cyhalothrin with fenazaquin; sulfur combinations with deltamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, thiomethoxam and deltamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, β-cyfluthrin and endosulfan with propargite were not compatible chemically, which led to ineffectiveness in controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatian. Cypermethrih with urea, MOP and ZnSO4; fenazaquin with cypermethrin, endosulfan, thiomethoxam and imidacloprid; sulfur with endosulfan, alphamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin and imidacloprid; and propargite with λ-cyhalothrin and alphamethrin were compatible with reference to no reduction in bioefficacy of insecticides while mixing with acaricides and foliar nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cypermethrin with propagite was chemically incompatible and ineffective against tea mosquito bug.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
cypermethrin with propagitee0
Interactor
tea aosquito buge0pest
Outcome
controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatiane0
Direction
ineffectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of cypermethrin with propagite ana fenpyroximatea combinations of deltamethrin, alphamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, λ-cyhalothrin with fenazaquin; sulfur combinations with deltamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, thiomethoxam and deltamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, β-cyfluthrin and endosulfan with propargite were not compatible chemically, which led to ineffectiveness in controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatian.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

deltamethrin, alphamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, λ-cyhalothrin with fenazaquin was chemically incompatible and ineffective against tea mosquito bug.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
deltamethrin, alphamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, λ-cyhalothrin with fenazaquine0
Interactor
tea aosquito buge0pest
Outcome
controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatiane0
Direction
ineffectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of cypermethrin with propagite ana fenpyroximatea combinations of deltamethrin, alphamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, λ-cyhalothrin with fenazaquin; sulfur combinations with deltamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, thiomethoxam and deltamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, β-cyfluthrin and endosulfan with propargite were not compatible chemically, which led to ineffectiveness in controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatian.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sulfur combinations with deltamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, thiomethoxam was chemically incompatible and ineffective against tea mosquito bug.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
sulfur combinations with deltamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, thiomethoxame0
Interactor
tea aosquito buge0pest
Outcome
controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatiane0
Direction
ineffectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of cypermethrin with propagite ana fenpyroximatea combinations of deltamethrin, alphamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, λ-cyhalothrin with fenazaquin; sulfur combinations with deltamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, thiomethoxam and deltamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, β-cyfluthrin and endosulfan with propargite were not compatible chemically, which led to ineffectiveness in controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatian.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

deltamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, β-cyfluthrin and endosulfan with propargite was chemically incompatible and ineffective against tea mosquito bug.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
deltamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, β-cyfluthrin and endosulfan with propargitee0
Interactor
tea aosquito buge0pest
Outcome
controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatiane0
Direction
ineffectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of cypermethrin with propagite ana fenpyroximatea combinations of deltamethrin, alphamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, λ-cyhalothrin with fenazaquin; sulfur combinations with deltamethrin, β-cyfluthrin, thiomethoxam and deltamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin, β-cyfluthrin and endosulfan with propargite were not compatible chemically, which led to ineffectiveness in controlling the tea aosquito bug infestatian.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrih with urea, MOP and ZnSO4 was compatible without reduced insecticide bioefficacy.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
Cypermethrih with urea, MOP and ZnSO4e0
Outcome
bioefficacy of insecticidese0
Direction
no reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cypermethrih with urea, MOP and ZnSO4; fenazaquin with cypermethrin, endosulfan, thiomethoxam and imidacloprid; sulfur with endosulfan, alphamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin and imidacloprid; and propargite with λ-cyhalothrin and alphamethrin were compatible with reference to no reduction in bioefficacy of insecticides while mixing with acaricides and foliar nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fenazaquin with cypermethrin, endosulfan, thiomethoxam and imidacloprid was compatible without reduced insecticide bioefficacy.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
fenazaquin with cypermethrin, endosulfan, thiomethoxam and imidaclopride0
Outcome
bioefficacy of insecticidese0
Direction
no reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cypermethrih with urea, MOP and ZnSO4; fenazaquin with cypermethrin, endosulfan, thiomethoxam and imidacloprid; sulfur with endosulfan, alphamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin and imidacloprid; and propargite with λ-cyhalothrin and alphamethrin were compatible with reference to no reduction in bioefficacy of insecticides while mixing with acaricides and foliar nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sulfur with endosulfan, alphamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin and imidacloprid was compatible without reduced insecticide bioefficacy.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
sulfur with endosulfan, alphamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin and imidaclopride0
Outcome
bioefficacy of insecticidese0
Direction
no reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cypermethrih with urea, MOP and ZnSO4; fenazaquin with cypermethrin, endosulfan, thiomethoxam and imidacloprid; sulfur with endosulfan, alphamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin and imidacloprid; and propargite with λ-cyhalothrin and alphamethrin were compatible with reference to no reduction in bioefficacy of insecticides while mixing with acaricides and foliar nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

propargite with λ-cyhalothrin and alphamethrin was compatible without reduced insecticide bioefficacy.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
propargite with λ-cyhalothrin and alphamethrine0
Outcome
bioefficacy of insecticidese0
Direction
no reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cypermethrih with urea, MOP and ZnSO4; fenazaquin with cypermethrin, endosulfan, thiomethoxam and imidacloprid; sulfur with endosulfan, alphamethrin, λ-cyhalothrin and imidacloprid; and propargite with λ-cyhalothrin and alphamethrin were compatible with reference to no reduction in bioefficacy of insecticides while mixing with acaricides and foliar nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–118 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.