Paper · 1993 · Experimental Agriculture

Effects of Light, Temperature, Irrigation and Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Rate in Tea (Camellia Sinensis)

B. Gail Smith; William Stephens; Paul J. Burgess; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
43
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Photosynthetic rates were monitored during the warm dry season in tea Clone 6/8 in a line-source irrigation × fertilizer experiment in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Irrigation and fertilizer increased photosynthetic rate both by enhancing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area (A) in healthy leaves and by increasing the proportion of sunlight intercepted by photosynthetically efficient leaves. Irrigation-induced increases in A could be accounted for by increases in stomatal conductance (g) and associated reductions in leaf temperature. Fertilizer at an annual application rate of 225 kg N ha -1 caused increases in A associated with increases in g and improved responses to ambient CO 2 concentration and illuminance (photon flux density, PFD). However, a further increase in fertilizer application rate to 375 kg N ha -1 a -1 decreased A in spite of increasing g. Light-saturation of photosynthesis occurred only at the higher fertilizer application rate. In unfertilized tea or tea fertilized at the lower rate, A decreased at a PFD of between 1400 and 2000 μmol m -2 s -l . These results are discussed in terms of the relation between photosynthesis and yield in tea. Fotosíntesis en el té

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased tea photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area.

Taxon
teae1
Material
Clone 6/8e1
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area (A)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation and fertilizer increased photosynthetic rate both by enhancing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area (A) in healthy leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased tea photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area (A)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation and fertilizer increased photosynthetic rate both by enhancing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area (A) in healthy leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased the proportion of sunlight intercepted by efficient tea leaves.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
proportion of sunlight intercepted by photosynthetically efficient leavese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation and fertilizer increased photosynthetic rate both by enhancing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area (A) in healthy leaves and by increasing the proportion of sunlight intercepted by photosynthetically efficient leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased the proportion of sunlight intercepted by efficient tea leaves.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
proportion of sunlight intercepted by photosynthetically efficient leavese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation and fertilizer increased photosynthetic rate both by enhancing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area (A) in healthy leaves and by increasing the proportion of sunlight intercepted by photosynthetically efficient leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation-related increases in leaf photosynthesis were accounted for by increased stomatal conductance and reduced leaf temperature.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
increases in Ae0
Qualifier
increases in stomatal conductance (g) and associated reductions in leaf temperaturee0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation-induced increases in A could be accounted for by increases in stomatal conductance (g) and associated reductions in leaf temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–555 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer at 225 kg N ha -1 increased tea leaf photosynthesis.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
Fertilizer at an annual application rate of 225 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
Ae0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer at an annual application rate of 225 kg N ha -1 caused increases in A associated with increases in g and improved responses to ambient CO 2 concentration and illuminance (photon flux density, PFD).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer at 225 kg N ha -1 increased tea stomatal conductance.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
Fertilizer at an annual application rate of 225 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
ge0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer at an annual application rate of 225 kg N ha -1 caused increases in A associated with increases in g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer at 225 kg N ha -1 improved tea photosynthetic responses to ambient CO2 and illuminance.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
Fertilizer at an annual application rate of 225 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
responses to ambient CO 2 concentration and illuminancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer at an annual application rate of 225 kg N ha -1 caused increases in A associated with increases in g and improved responses to ambient CO 2 concentration and illuminance (photon flux density, PFD).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer at 375 kg N ha -1 a -1 decreased tea leaf photosynthesis despite increasing conductance.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
fertilizer application rate to 375 kg N ha -1 a -1e0
Outcome
Ae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a further increase in fertilizer application rate to 375 kg N ha -1 a -1 decreased A in spite of increasing g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer at 375 kg N ha -1 a -1 increased tea stomatal conductance.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
fertilizer application rate to 375 kg N ha -1 a -1e0
Outcome
ge0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a further increase in fertilizer application rate to 375 kg N ha -1 a -1 decreased A in spite of increasing g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light saturation of tea photosynthesis occurred only at the higher fertilizer rate.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
higher fertilizer application ratee0
Outcome
Light-saturation of photosynthesis occurrede0

Verbatim

e0

“Light-saturation of photosynthesis occurred only at the higher fertilizer application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–976 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea Clone 6/8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At photon flux density of 1400 to 2000 μmol m -2 s -l, leaf photosynthesis decreased in unfertilized tea.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
unfertilizede0
Outcome
Ae0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
PFD of between 1400 and 2000 μmol m -2 s -le0

Verbatim

e0

“In unfertilized tea or tea fertilized at the lower rate, A decreased at a PFD of between 1400 and 2000 μmol m -2 s -l .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1096 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At photon flux density of 1400 to 2000 μmol m -2 s -l, leaf photosynthesis decreased in tea given lower fertilizer.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
fertilized at the lower ratee0
Outcome
Ae0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
PFD of between 1400 and 2000 μmol m -2 s -le0

Verbatim

e0

“In unfertilized tea or tea fertilized at the lower rate, A decreased at a PFD of between 1400 and 2000 μmol m -2 s -l .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1096 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.