Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Influence of Irrigation Schedule, Weed Management and Nitrogen Levels on Grain Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Water Productivity of Aerobic Rice

Md. Latheef Pasha; M. D. Reddy; Madem Gurivi Reddy; et al.

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conduded during the kharif season of 2008 and 2009 to find out the effed of irrigation schedules, weed management practices and nitrogen levels on growth, yield attributes, grain yield and economics of aerobic rice. Pooled data of two years on yield attributes and grain yield were not much varied between irrigation scheduled at 7 days interval during vegetative stage and 4 days interval during reproductive stage and irrigation once in 2 days. In former treatment, water productivity (WP), gross and net income and benefit cost (B: C) ratio were higher. Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher tiller number, dry matter production, panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per panicle, grain yield (4991 kg ha−1) and NPK uptake at harvest than pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DAS. The water productivity, gross and net income and B: C ratio were higher in former treatment. Pooled data of yield attributes, grain yield and NPK uptake were not much varied among N levels. The water productivity, gross and net income and B: C ratio were higher at 180 kg N ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes and grain yield of aerobic rice did not vary much between irrigation at 7-day interval in the vegetative stage and 4-day interval in the reproductive stage and irrigation once in 2 days (pooled over two years).

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
irrigation scheduled at 7 days interval during vegetative stage and 4 days interval during reproductive stagee1
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde1
Direction
not much variede1
Comparator
irrigation once in 2 dayse1

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled data of two years on yield attributes and grain yield were not much varied between irrigation scheduled at 7 days interval during vegetative stage and 4 days interval during reproductive stage and irrigation once in 2 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity was higher under the 7-day vegetative / 4-day reproductive irrigation schedule than under irrigation once in 2 days.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
irrigation scheduled at 7 days interval during vegetative stage and 4 days interval during reproductive stagee1
Outcome
water productivitye2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
irrigation once in 2 dayse1

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled data of two years on yield attributes and grain yield were not much varied between irrigation scheduled at 7 days interval during vegetative stage and 4 days interval during reproductive stage and irrigation once in 2 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“In former treatment, water productivity (WP), gross and net income and benefit cost (B: C) ratio were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross income, net income and benefit cost ratio were higher under the 7-day vegetative / 4-day reproductive irrigation schedule than under irrigation once in 2 days.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
irrigation scheduled at 7 days interval during vegetative stage and 4 days interval during reproductive stagee1
Outcome
gross and net income and benefit cost (B: C) ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
irrigation once in 2 dayse1

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled data of two years on yield attributes and grain yield were not much varied between irrigation scheduled at 7 days interval during vegetative stage and 4 days interval during reproductive stage and irrigation once in 2 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“In former treatment, water productivity (WP), gross and net income and benefit cost (B: C) ratio were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pendimethalin followed by cono weeding at 30 DAS and one hand weeding at 45 DAS gave significantly higher tiller number and dry matter production than pendimethalin followed by 2,4-D sodium salt at 40 DAS and hand weeding at 20 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DASe0
Outcome
tiller number, dry matter productione0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DASe0

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher tiller number, dry matter production, panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per panicle, grain yield (4991 kg ha−1) and NPK uptake at harvest than pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same weed management treatment gave significantly higher panicle number, panicle weight and filled spikelets per panicle than the comparator weed management.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DASe0
Outcome
panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per paniclee0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DASe0

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher tiller number, dry matter production, panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per panicle, grain yield (4991 kg ha−1) and NPK uptake at harvest than pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same weed management treatment gave significantly higher grain yield (4991 kg ha-1) than the comparator weed management.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
4991 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DASe0

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher tiller number, dry matter production, panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per panicle, grain yield (4991 kg ha−1) and NPK uptake at harvest than pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same weed management treatment gave significantly higher NPK uptake at harvest than the comparator weed management.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DASe0
Outcome
NPK uptake at harveste0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DASe0

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher tiller number, dry matter production, panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per panicle, grain yield (4991 kg ha−1) and NPK uptake at harvest than pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity was higher under the pendimethalin plus cono weeding plus hand weeding treatment than under the comparator weed management.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DASe0
Outcome
water productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DASe0

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher tiller number, dry matter production, panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per panicle, grain yield (4991 kg ha−1) and NPK uptake at harvest than pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“The water productivity, gross and net income and B: C ratio were higher in former treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross income, net income and B:C ratio were higher under the pendimethalin plus cono weeding plus hand weeding treatment than under the comparator weed management.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DASe0
Outcome
gross and net income and B: C ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DASe0

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre emergence application of pendimethaiin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 followed by (fb) cono weeding at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and one hand weeding (HW) at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher tiller number, dry matter production, panicle number and weight and filled spikelets per panicle, grain yield (4991 kg ha−1) and NPK uptake at harvest than pre emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb 2, 40 Na salt @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 at 40 DAS and HW at 20 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“The water productivity, gross and net income and B: C ratio were higher in former treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes, grain yield and NPK uptake did not vary much among nitrogen levels (pooled data).

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
N levelse1
Outcome
yield attributes, grain yield and NPK uptakee1
Direction
not much variede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled data of yield attributes, grain yield and NPK uptake were not much varied among N levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity was higher at 180 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
180 kg N ha−1e1
Outcome
water productivitye1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The water productivity, gross and net income and B: C ratio were higher at 180 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross income, net income and B:C ratio were higher at 180 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
Aerobic Ricet0
Treatment
180 kg N ha−1e1
Outcome
gross and net income and B: C ratioe1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Aerobic Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The water productivity, gross and net income and B: C ratio were higher at 180 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1324 · show in text ↑

herbicide · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 29 positive, 5 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.