Paper · 2010 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Influence of pruning intensities on leaf nutrient composition in some mango cultivars planted under high density

Sanjay Kumar Singh; S. K. Singh; R.R. Sharma; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on mango cultivars (Amrapali, Mallika and Dashehari) planted under high density to study the changes in the nutrient composition in leaves after pruning. The maximum nitrogen percentage was found in Amrapali in ‘on’ year while Dashehari recorded the lowest. Similarly, the highest phosphorus, calcium and sulphur was estimated in leaves of Mallika, whereas Amrapali had the lowest phosphorus, calcium and magnesium content. The significant difference was also observed for N, P (‘on’ year), Ca, Mg and S due to different pruning levels. The highest N and Ca content were observed in control (un-pruned) trees, which had the lowest levels of Mg and S. The light pruning improved the level of phosphorus but reduced the nitrogen concentration. Severe pruning led to lowest P and Mg content with better S content. The interaction effect due to cultivar and pruning intensity was found to be significant for nutrient like N, C and M. The pruning intensity did not have any significant effect on potassium content. Consequently, major nutrients (primary and secondary) reduced during flowering, while during ‘on’ year the N, P and Ca levels increased. In contrast, Mg and S were observed to be higher during vegetative phase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amrapali had maximum nitrogen percentage in the on year.

Material
Amrapalie0
Outcome
nitrogen percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
‘on’ yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum nitrogen percentage was found in Amrapali in ‘on’ year while Dashehari recorded the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dashehari had the lowest nitrogen percentage.

Material
Dasheharie0
Outcome
nitrogen percentagee0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum nitrogen percentage was found in Amrapali in ‘on’ year while Dashehari recorded the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mallika had highest phosphorus, calcium and sulphur in leaves.

Material
Mallikae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
phosphorus, calcium and sulphure0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest phosphorus, calcium and sulphur was estimated in leaves of Mallika”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amrapali had lowest phosphorus, calcium and magnesium.

Material
Amrapalie0
Outcome
phosphorus, calcium and magnesium contente0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Amrapali had the lowest phosphorus, calcium and magnesium content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning levels significantly changed N, P, Ca, Mg and S.

Treatment
different pruning levelse0
Outcome
N, P (‘on’ year), Ca, Mg and Se0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The significant difference was also observed for N, P (‘on’ year), Ca, Mg and S due to different pruning levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unpruned controls had highest N and Ca content.

Treatment
control (un-pruned)e0
Outcome
N and Ca contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest N and Ca content were observed in control (un-pruned) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unpruned controls had lowest Mg and S levels.

Treatment
control (un-pruned)e0
Outcome
levels of Mg and Se0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“control (un-pruned) trees, which had the lowest levels of Mg and S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light pruning improved phosphorus.

Treatment
light pruninge0
Outcome
level of phosphoruse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The light pruning improved the level of phosphorus but reduced the nitrogen concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light pruning reduced nitrogen concentration.

Treatment
light pruninge0
Outcome
nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The light pruning improved the level of phosphorus but reduced the nitrogen concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe pruning gave lowest P and Mg.

Treatment
Severe pruninge0
Outcome
P and Mg contente0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Severe pruning led to lowest P and Mg content with better S content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe pruning gave better S content.

Treatment
Severe pruninge0
Outcome
S contente0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Severe pruning led to lowest P and Mg content with better S content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–843 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and pruning intensity interacted significantly for N, C and M.

Treatment
pruning intensitye0
Outcome
nutrient like N, C and Me0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effect due to cultivar and pruning intensity was found to be significant for nutrient like N, C and M.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning intensity had no significant effect on potassium content.

Treatment
pruning intensitye0
Outcome
potassium contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pruning intensity did not have any significant effect on potassium content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Major nutrients reduced during flowering.

Organ / stage
floweringe0
Outcome
major nutrients (primary and secondary)e0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“major nutrients (primary and secondary) reduced during flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and Ca increased during the on year.

Outcome
N, P and Ca levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
‘on’ yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“during ‘on’ year the N, P and Ca levels increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg and S were higher during vegetative phase.

Organ / stage
vegetative phasee0
Outcome
Mg and Se0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mg and S were observed to be higher during vegetative phase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1253 · show in text ↑

pruning · nutrient: content · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.