Paper · 1985 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Growth of bean plants at elevated carbon dioxide concentrations

Peter A. Jolliffe; David L. Ehret

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Pure Gold Wax were grown in controlled environment chambers at six CO 2 concentrations ranging from 340 to 3000 μL L −1 . Data for plant growth analysis were obtained from five harvests from 11 to 55 days after planting. Growth curves were fitted to the data using a cubic spline regression procedure. CO 2 enrichment caused large and rapid increases in leaf dry weight, unit leaf rate, and specific leaf weight. Smaller responses included a decrease in leaf area ratio and an increase in leaf weight ratio. Root dry weight and leaf area were not significantly affected by CO 2 treatments. Relative growth rate was initially higher in CO 2 -enriched plants and later declined; it may not be a suitable index for the evaluation of CO 2 effects during long periods of growth. The results indicate that leaf formation and expansion were not limited by assimilate supply. Maximum growth and pod yield were obtained in plants grown at 1200 μL L −1 CO 2 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide enrichment increased leaf dry weight, unit leaf rate, and specific leaf weight.

Taxon
bean plantst0
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
leaf dry weight, unit leaf rate, and specific leaf weighte0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 enrichment caused large and rapid increases in leaf dry weight, unit leaf rate, and specific leaf weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide enrichment decreased leaf area ratio.

Taxon
bean plantst0
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
leaf area ratioe1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–353 · show in text ↑
e1

“a decrease in leaf area ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide enrichment increased leaf weight ratio.

Taxon
bean plantst0
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
leaf weight ratioe1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–353 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase in leaf weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide treatments did not significantly affect root dry weight or leaf area.

Taxon
bean plantst0
Treatment
CO 2 treatmentse0
Outcome
Root dry weight and leaf areae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Root dry weight and leaf area were not significantly affected by CO 2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate was initially higher in carbon dioxide enriched plants but later declined.

Taxon
bean plantst0
Outcome
Relative growth ratee0
Direction
initially higher in CO 2 -enriched plants and later declinede0

Verbatim

e0

“Relative growth rate was initially higher in CO 2 -enriched plants and later declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf formation and expansion were interpreted as not limited by assimilate supply.

Taxon
bean plantst0
Outcome
leaf formation and expansione0
Direction
not limitede0
Qualifier
assimilate supplye0

Verbatim

e0

“leaf formation and expansion were not limited by assimilate supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum growth and pod yield occurred at 1200 μL L −1 CO 2.

Taxon
bean plantst0
Outcome
growth and pod yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1200 μL L −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum growth and pod yield were obtained in plants grown at 1200 μL L −1 CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 16 positive, 6 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.