Paper · 2011

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SALINITY LEVELS ON MORPHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERS OF 8 WHEAT GENOTYPES (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)

Sadat Noori Seied Ahmad; Khalaj Hamide; Labbafi Mohammad Reza

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For examining and producing salt tolerant wheat genotype based on morpho-physiological characteristics, a factorial experiment was set out in a green-house in a completely randomized design with three replications. The treatments included four saline solutions (0, 150, 200 and 250 mM NaCl) and 8 wheat genotypes: 3 hybrids (Cajema × Sette Cerros, Cajema × HO2 and Cajema × Lermaroja), 4 parents (Sette Cerros, HO2, Lermaroja, Cajema) and Axona as a control. Data for Na + , K + and Cl concentrations and Na /K ratio in the first leaf below the flag leaf yield and 1000 grain yield were measured. Based on analysis of variance, salinity had positive significant effect on Na + , Cl concentrations and Na /K ratio. As salinity levels increased, yield and 1000 grain weight and K + concentration declined. Based on Na /K ratio, the best physiological characteristic for recognizing sensitive and tolerant genotypes, Cajema was the most tolerant genotype. Hybrids produced in this study weren’t good for salinity condition and the hybrids didn’t show more feature than their parents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased wheat Na +.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
Na +e0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on analysis of variance, salinity had positive significant effect on Na + , Cl concentrations and Na /K ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased wheat Cl concentrations.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
Cl concentrationse0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on analysis of variance, salinity had positive significant effect on Na + , Cl concentrations and Na /K ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased wheat Na /K ratio.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
Na /K ratioe0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on analysis of variance, salinity had positive significant effect on Na + , Cl concentrations and Na /K ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced wheat yield.

Treatment
salinity levelse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As salinity levels increased, yield and 1000 grain weight and K + concentration declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced wheat 1000 grain weight.

Treatment
salinity levelse0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As salinity levels increased, yield and 1000 grain weight and K + concentration declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced wheat K + concentration.

Treatment
salinity levelse0
Outcome
K + concentratione0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As salinity levels increased, yield and 1000 grain weight and K + concentration declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cajema was the most salt tolerant wheat genotype by Na/K ratio.

Material
Cajemae0
Outcome
most tolerant genotypee0
Direction
most tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on Na /K ratio, the best physiological characteristic for recognizing sensitive and tolerant genotypes, Cajema was the most tolerant genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat hybrids were unsuitable for salinity conditions and did not outperform their parents.

Material
Hybridse0
Outcome
didn’t show more featuree0
Comparator
their parentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids produced in this study weren’t good for salinity condition and the hybrids didn’t show more feature than their parents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.