Paper · 2015 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Comparative study of methodologies to determine the antioxidant capacity of Al-toxified blueberry amended with calcium sulfate

C Meriño-Gergichevich; G Ondrasek; M Zovko; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is well adapted to acidic soils where aluminum (Al 3+ ) can be linked to oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity (AC).Calcium sulfate (CaSO 4 ) is used to alleviate Al 3+ because it does not alter soil acidity.However, the role of Ca addition in AC, based on a single electron transfer reaction (SET), remains unknown.The aim was to evaluate the AC using SET methodologies, i.e., 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2´-Azinobis-bis (3 ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and ferric reducing-antioxidant power (FRAP).Bueberry cultivars Elliot and Jersey were grown and exposed to the following treatments for 15 days: Control (nutrient solution alone, pH 4.5); control+Al (Al); control+Al+Ca (Al+Ca) and control+Ca (Ca).The Ca and Al concentrations, total phenol (TP) content and radical scavenging activity (RSA) were evaluated at 7 and 15 days.The Al+Ca and Ca treatments increased the Ca concentration in the leaves (22%) and roots (40%) of both cultivars compared with the control.The Ca in the tissues varied with cultivar and time.After 15 days, increases in TP, DPPH, ABTS and FRAP were detected.The cultivars showed positive relationships between the TP and AC in the leaves and roots.Thus, CaSO 4 is an important tool to improve the AC in Al-stressed fruit crops grown in acid soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al+Ca and Ca treatments raised leaf calcium concentration by 22% versus control.

Taxon
Blueberrye1
Treatment
Al+Ca and Ca treatmentse0
Outcome
Ca concentration in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The Al+Ca and Ca treatments increased the Ca concentration in the leaves (22%) and roots (40%) of both cultivars compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is well adapted to acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al+Ca and Ca treatments raised root calcium concentration by 40% versus control.

Taxon
Blueberrye1
Treatment
Al+Ca and Ca treatmentse0
Outcome
Ca concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The Al+Ca and Ca treatments increased the Ca concentration in the leaves (22%) and roots (40%) of both cultivars compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is well adapted to acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue calcium varied by cultivar and time.

Taxon
Blueberrye1
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
Ca in the tissuese0
Qualifier
timee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca in the tissues varied with cultivar and time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is well adapted to acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenol content rose after 15 days.

Taxon
Blueberrye1
Outcome
TPe0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
After 15 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“After 15 days, increases in TP, DPPH, ABTS and FRAP were detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is well adapted to acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH, ABTS and FRAP measures rose after 15 days.

Taxon
Blueberrye1
Outcome
DPPH, ABTS and FRAPe0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
After 15 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“After 15 days, increases in TP, DPPH, ABTS and FRAP were detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is well adapted to acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenols were positively related to antioxidant capacity in leaves and roots.

Taxon
Blueberrye1
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Compound
TPe0
Outcome
ACe0
Direction
positivee0

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars showed positive relationships between the TP and AC in the leaves and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is well adapted to acidic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend CaSO 4 to improve antioxidant capacity of aluminum-stressed fruit crops.

Taxon
fruit cropse0
Treatment
CaSO 4e0
Outcome
improve the ACe0
Qualifier
Al-stressede0

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, CaSO 4 is an important tool to improve the AC in Al-stressed fruit crops grown in acid soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1343 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · VacciniumResults differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

aluminium atom · nutrient: content · VacciniumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.