Paper · 2006 · Pesticide Research Journal

Management of Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias Vittella Fabr. Through Bio-Rational Insecticides

SC Gupta; AK Misra

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two rational insecticides viz. endosulfan (35 EC) and carbofuran (3 G, at last ploughing) as well as biocides viz. neem oil and spicturin were tested for managing Earias vittelia Fabr. in okra. Endosulfan at 0.25 kg ai ha−1 and spicturin at 0.5 L ha−1 alternatively sprayed at 6 AM and 4 PM when the infestation exceeded ETL (5.3% wt basis) after 92 days of carbofuran (3 G) soil treatment was found most effective in lowering the pest incidence (6.83% fruit weight basis) as well as the larval population (104.3 per 100 fruits). This treatment gave the maximum yield of okra (112.7 q ha−1) as well as the maximum return per rupee investment (Rs4.23).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The alternating endosulfan and spicturin program after carbofuran treatment most effectively lowered pest incidence to 6.83% fruit weight basis.

Treatment
Endosulfan at 0.25 kg ai ha−1 and spicturin at 0.5 L ha−1 alternatively sprayed at 6 AM and 4 PMe0
Interactor
Earias Vittella Fabr.t0pest
Outcome
pest incidencee0
Direction
loweringe0
Value
6.83% fruit weight basise0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endosulfan at 0.25 kg ai ha−1 and spicturin at 0.5 L ha−1 alternatively sprayed at 6 AM and 4 PM when the infestation exceeded ETL (5.3% wt basis) after 92 days of carbofuran (3 G) soil treatment was found most effective in lowering the pest incidence (6.83% fruit weight basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias Vittella Fabr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The program most effectively lowered the larval population to 104.3 per 100 fruits.

Treatment
Endosulfan at 0.25 kg ai ha−1 and spicturin at 0.5 L ha−1e1
Interactor
Earias Vittella Fabr.t0pest
Outcome
larval populatione0
Direction
loweringe1
Value
104.3 per 100 fruitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as the larval population (104.3 per 100 fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias Vittella Fabr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Endosulfan at 0.25 kg ai ha−1 and spicturin at 0.5 L ha−1 alternatively sprayed at 6 AM and 4 PM when the infestation exceeded ETL (5.3% wt basis) after 92 days of carbofuran (3 G) soil treatment was found most effective in lowering the pest incidence (6.83% fruit weight basis) as well as the larval population (104.3 per 100 fruits). This treatment gave the maximum yield of okra (112.7 q ha−1) as well as the maximum return per rupee investment (Rs4.23).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The program gave maximum okra yield of 112.7 q ha−1.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
yield of okrae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
112.7 q ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment gave the maximum yield of okra (112.7 q ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The program gave maximum return per rupee investment of Rs4.23.

Treatment
This treatmente1
Outcome
return per rupee investmente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs4.23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as the maximum return per rupee investment (Rs4.23)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment gave the maximum yield of okra (112.7 q ha−1) as well as the maximum return per rupee investment (Rs4.23).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–651 · show in text ↑

endosulfan · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.