Paper · 2020 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Eco-friendly management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) and neem oil cake

Akankshya Mohapatra; J.K. Mahalik; B.K. Dash; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Neem oil cake @ 100 g and 200 g/m², AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) @ 5 g and 10 g/m² were applied as single and in combinations. Carbofuran @ 0.3 g a.i./m² was applied as standard chemical check. All the treatments significantly increased the okra growth parameters and reduced root knot nematode population and other infection parameters over check. It was also found that there was a significant rise in the population of AM fungus, its colonization in roots as well as phosphorus content in plants in treatment where AM fungus was inoculated alone and in combination with neem oil cake. Among various treatments, application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 200 g/m² performing better than others, contributing significantly increase in plant growth parameters, phosphorus content with corresponding decrease in root knot nematode infection as compared to inoculated untreated check followed by application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 100 g/m², which were statistically at par. In view of cost effective and low cost management option, application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 100 g/m² was considered the most promising management option against root knot nematode (M. incognita) affecting okra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly increased okra growth parameters relative to check.

Treatment
All the treatmentse0
Outcome
okra growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments significantly increased the okra growth parameters and reduced root knot nematode population and other infection parameters over check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced root knot nematode population and infection parameters.

Treatment
All the treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
root knot nematode population and other infection parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments significantly increased the okra growth parameters and reduced root knot nematode population and other infection parameters over check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus inoculation alone or with neem cake raised AM fungus population and root colonization.

Treatment
AM fungus was inoculated alone and in combination with neem oil cakee0
Interactor
AM funguse0symbiont
Outcome
population of AM fungus, its colonization in rootse0
Direction
risee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant rise in the population of AM fungus, its colonization in roots as well as phosphorus content in plants in treatment where AM fungus was inoculated alone and in combination with neem oil cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus inoculation alone or with neem cake raised plant phosphorus content.

Treatment
AM fungus was inoculated alone and in combination with neem oil cakee0
Interactor
AM funguse0symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus content in plantse0
Direction
risee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant rise in the population of AM fungus, its colonization in roots as well as phosphorus content in plants in treatment where AM fungus was inoculated alone and in combination with neem oil cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus at 10 g/m² with neem cake at 200 g/m² increased growth and phosphorus more than other treatments.

Treatment
application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 200 g/m²e0
Interactor
AM funguse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth parameters, phosphorus contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
inoculated untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 200 g/m² performing better than others, contributing significantly increase in plant growth parameters, phosphorus content with corresponding decrease in root knot nematode infection as compared to inoculated untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus at 10 g/m² with neem cake at 200 g/m² reduced nematode infection.

Treatment
application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 200 g/m²e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Second interactor
AM funguse0symbiont
Outcome
root knot nematode infectione0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
inoculated untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 200 g/m² performing better than others, contributing significantly increase in plant growth parameters, phosphorus content with corresponding decrease in root knot nematode infection as compared to inoculated untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 10 g/m² AM fungus and 100 g/m² neem cake treatment was statistically at par with the 200 g/m² neem cake treatment.

Treatment
application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 100 g/m²e0
Outcome
statistically at pare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 100 g/m², which were statistically at par”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favored 10 g/m² AM fungus with 100 g/m² neem cake as the most promising low cost nematode management option.

Treatment
application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 100 g/m²e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
most promising management option against root knot nematode (M. incognita)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of AM fungus @ 10 g/m² with neem cake @ 100 g/m² was considered the most promising management option against root knot nematode (M. incognita) affecting okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1228 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

botanical · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 49 positive, 8 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.