Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at Kittur Rani Channamma College of Horticulture, Arabhavi, Gokak Taluk, Belgaum district of Karnataka state during the rabi season of the year 2011–2012 to study the effect of organic and inorganic sources of nitrogenon growth, yield and quality of garlic (Allium sativum L.)cv. Vannur Local. Significant differences were observed among different treatments with reference to plant height, leaf length, leaf breadth, collar diameter, fresh and dry weight of garlic. However, Significant differences were also observed with reference to yield and quality parameters like weight of bulb, diameter of bulb, weight of clove and bulb yield and sulphur content of bulbs. Significantly highest bulb yield (5.36t/ha) was recorded in T8 (100% RDN through vermicompost).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen treatments differed significantly in garlic growth traits.
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Treatment
- different treatmentse0
- Outcome
- plant height, leaf length, leaf breadthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed among different treatments with reference to plant height, leaf length, leaf breadth, collar diameter, fresh and dry weight of garlic”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen treatments differed significantly in collar diameter and fresh and dry weight.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativume0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse0
- Outcome
- collar diameter, fresh and dry weight of garlice0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed among different treatments with reference to plant height, leaf length, leaf breadth, collar diameter, fresh and dry weight of garlic”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments differed significantly in bulb and clove measures.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse1
- Outcome
- weight of bulb, diameter of bulb, weight of clovee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were also observed with reference to yield and quality parameters like weight of bulb, diameter of bulb, weight of clove and bulb yield and sulphur content of bulbs”
e1“different treatments”
t0“Garlic”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments differed significantly in bulb yield and sulphur content.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse1
- Outcome
- bulb yield and sulphur content of bulbse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were also observed with reference to yield and quality parameters like weight of bulb, diameter of bulb, weight of clove and bulb yield and sulphur content of bulbs”
e1“different treatments”
t0“Garlic”
Claim · model-written summary
T8, using all recommended nitrogen through vermicompost, had the highest bulb yield of 5.36t/ha.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- T8 (100% RDN through vermicompost)e0
- Outcome
- bulb yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.36t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly highest bulb yield (5.36t/ha) was recorded in T8 (100% RDN through vermicompost)”
t0“Garlic”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.