Paper · 2015 · ORBi (University of Liège)

Effects of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Wheat Growth under Greenhouse and Field Conditions in combination with different nitrogen fertilizer levels

Minh Nguyen; Marc Ongena; Gilles Colinet; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Many Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to enhance root growth, mineral availability, and nutrient use efficiency of crops. The aim of this project is to screen commercially available PGPR formulations and lab strains to increase wheat growth and yield in combination with an optimized nitrogen (N) fertilizer application scheme. This could lead to a significant reduction of N fertilizer application without affecting the subsequent grain yields. The screened products collection includes (1) Mix1 (a mix of Azospirillum sp., Azorhizobium sp., and Azoarcus sp.), (2) Mix2 (a mix of Mix1 complemented with two strains of phosphorus-solubilizing Bacillus sp.), (3) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens a, (4) B. subtilis, and (5) B. amyloliquefaciens b. These products were screened under greenhouse and field conditions in 2014 by using spring and winter wheat varieties, respectively. Under greenhouse conditions, there was a significant increase in root dry weight and in root per shoot ratio of plants inoculated with Mix1. Under field conditions, the interaction between PGPR inoculation and different N fertilizer doses was assessed. The grain yield was negatively impacted by low N fertilizer applications. Under such conditions, the inoculation of the wheat rhizosphere with B. subtilis increased the grain yield by 15% relative to the water control. However, in the field trial, the variability between plot replicates was high and lead to non-significant results. Based on these results, modified screening strategies for PGPR selection were set up for the next trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mix1 inoculation significantly increased wheat root dry weight and root per shoot ratio in the greenhouse.

Treatment
inoculated with Mix1e0
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume2symbiont
Second interactor
Azorhizobium sp.Azorhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
root dry weight and in root per shoot ratioe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
Azoarcus sp.e2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azorhizobium
Azorhizobium · Second interactorTony Rebelo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greenhouse conditions, there was a significant increase in root dry weight and in root per shoot ratio of plants inoculated with Mix1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase wheat growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–270 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mix1 (a mix of Azospirillum sp., Azorhizobium sp., and Azoarcus sp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen fertilizer applications negatively affected wheat grain yield in the field.

Treatment
low N fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
negatively impactede0
Setting
field triale2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield was negatively impacted by low N fertilizer applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1220 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation of the wheat rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1284 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the field trial, the variability between plot replicates was high and lead to non-significant results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low nitrogen, B. subtilis inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 15% relative to water control, but field results were non-significant.

Treatment
inoculation of the wheat rhizosphere with B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
low N fertilizer applicationse1
Comparator
water controle0
Setting
field triale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under such conditions, the inoculation of the wheat rhizosphere with B. subtilis increased the grain yield by 15% relative to the water control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“low N fertilizer applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1219 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the field trial, the variability between plot replicates was high and lead to non-significant results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1480 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field plot replicates showed high variability.

Outcome
variability between plot replicatese0
Direction
highe0
Setting
field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the field trial, the variability between plot replicates was high and lead to non-significant results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1480 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase wheat growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–270 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Modified PGPR screening strategies were established for subsequent trials.

Outcome
modified screening strategies for PGPR selectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on these results, modified screening strategies for PGPR selection were set up for the next trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1586 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase wheat growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–270 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · Azospirillum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.