Paper · 2011 · Plant protection quarterly

Weed Control and Wheat Cultivars ('Triticum aestivum' L.) Responses to Metribuzin Application Rate and Timing in Iran

Zand Eskandar; M. A. Baghestani; Mohsen B. Mesgaran; et al.

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were established at four locations in Iran to evaluate the efficacy of metribuzin in controlling weeds in winter wheat. Metribuzin was applied either post-emergence (POST) or pre-emergence (PRE) at 0, 0.35, 0.52 and 0.70 g a.i. ha-1. At each location three conventionally planted wheat cultivars were tested. In most cases weed control increased with metribuzin rate following a linear or curvilinear trend with an application rate of 0.5 kg ha−1 a.i. providing an acceptable level of control. PRE applied metribuzin resulted in better control of weeds at Ahvaz while POST treatments were more effective at Karaj with no differences between PRE and POST treatments at two other locations (Zabol and Gorgan). Wheat yields increased with metribuzin rate at two locations (Ahvaz and Zabol) or showed minor (Karaj) to no changes (Gorgan) across application rates. Wheat yields were higher in PRE treated plots than in POST at Ahvaz, but lower at Karaj and did not vary at Zabol (with one exception) or Gorgan. Wheat cultivars also varied in their responses to metribuzin application rate or timing. Finally, metribuzin could be applied at 0.5 kg ha-1 a.i. (regardless of application timing) but not at higher rates at Ahvaz and Karaj, although higher rates at Zabol and Gorgan could provide both an acceptable level of weed control and wheat yield gain as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control generally increased with metribuzin rate, and 0.5 kg ha−1 a.i. gave acceptable control.

Treatment
metribuzin ratee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.5 kg ha−1 a.i.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases weed control increased with metribuzin rate following a linear or curvilinear trend with an application rate of 0.5 kg ha−1 a.i. providing an acceptable level of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence metribuzin gave better weed control at Ahvaz.

Treatment
PRE applied metribuzine0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
POST treatmentse0
Setting
Ahvaze0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRE applied metribuzin resulted in better control of weeds at Ahvaz while POST treatments were more effective at Karaj with no differences between PRE and POST treatments at two other locations (Zabol and Gorgan).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence metribuzin gave better weed control at Karaj.

Treatment
POST treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
PRE applied metribuzine0
Setting
Karaje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRE applied metribuzin resulted in better control of weeds at Ahvaz while POST treatments were more effective at Karaj with no differences between PRE and POST treatments at two other locations (Zabol and Gorgan).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre- and post-emergence metribuzin gave similar weed control at Zabol and Gorgan.

Treatment
PREe0
Outcome
no differencese0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
POST treatmentse0
Setting
Zabol and Gorgane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences between PRE and POST treatments at two other locations (Zabol and Gorgan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased with metribuzin rate at Ahvaz and Zabol.

Treatment
metribuzin ratee0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Ahvaz and Zabole0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields increased with metribuzin rate at two locations (Ahvaz and Zabol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield changed little with metribuzin rate at Karaj.

Treatment
application ratese0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Direction
minore0
Setting
Karaje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields increased with metribuzin rate at two locations (Ahvaz and Zabol) or showed minor (Karaj) to no changes (Gorgan) across application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield did not change across metribuzin rates at Gorgan.

Treatment
application ratese0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Direction
no changese0
Setting
Gorgane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields increased with metribuzin rate at two locations (Ahvaz and Zabol) or showed minor (Karaj) to no changes (Gorgan) across application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence plots had higher wheat yield than post-emergence plots at Ahvaz.

Treatment
PRE treated plotse0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
POSTe0
Setting
Ahvaze0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields were higher in PRE treated plots than in POST at Ahvaz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence plots had lower wheat yield than post-emergence plots at Karaj.

Treatment
PRE treated plotse0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
POSTe0
Setting
Karaje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields were higher in PRE treated plots than in POST at Ahvaz, but lower at Karaj”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yields mostly did not vary by metribuzin timing at Zabol or Gorgan.

Treatment
PREe0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Direction
did not varye0
Qualifier
with one exceptione0
Comparator
POSTe0
Setting
Zabole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields were higher in PRE treated plots than in POST at Ahvaz, but lower at Karaj and did not vary at Zabol (with one exception) or Gorgan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars varied in response to metribuzin rate or timing.

Material
Wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
responses to metribuzin application rate or timinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat cultivars also varied in their responses to metribuzin application rate or timing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 0.5 kg ha-1 a.i. metribuzin at Ahvaz and Karaj, but allowed higher rates at Zabol and Gorgan.

Outcome
metribuzin could be applied at 0.5 kg ha-1 a.i.e0
Setting
Ahvaz and Karaje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metribuzin could be applied at 0.5 kg ha-1 a.i. (regardless of application timing) but not at higher rates at Ahvaz and Karaj, although higher rates at Zabol and Gorgan could provide both an acceptable level of weed control and wheat yield gain as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.