Paper · 2002 · Progressive Agriculture

Effect of floral preservatives on vase life of gladiolus cv "Pink friendship"

Anju Pal; Santosh Kumar; Ranjan Srivastava

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The vase life of cut flowers of gladiolus cv Pink Friendship was found maximum (11.06 days) in the solution of combination of sucrose (4%) and 8-HQC (200 ppm) However, combinations like sucrose 2% + 8-HQC(200 ppm). sucrose 4% + A12(SO4)3 (300 ppm) and sucrose 4% + CoSO4 (400ppm) were also found better in increasing vase lie and quality of flower over control significantly. Whereas longevity of each floret was found maximum (4.57 days) in sucrose 4% + A12(SO4)3 (300ppm.).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose 4% with 8-HQC 200 ppm produced the maximum vase life, 11.06 days.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Material
Pink Friendshipe0
Organ / stage
cut flowerse0
Treatment
sucrose (4%) and 8-HQC (200 ppm)e0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.06 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“The vase life of cut flowers of gladiolus cv Pink Friendship was found maximum (11.06 days) in the solution of combination of sucrose (4%) and 8-HQC (200 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose 2% plus 8-HQC 200 ppm significantly improved vase life and flower quality over control.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
sucrose 2% + 8-HQC(200 ppm)e0
Outcome
vase lie and quality of flowere0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“sucrose 2% + 8-HQC(200 ppm). sucrose 4% + A12(SO4)3 (300 ppm) and sucrose 4% + CoSO4 (400ppm) were also found better in increasing vase lie and quality of flower over control significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose 4% plus A12(SO4)3 300 ppm significantly improved vase life and flower quality over control.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
sucrose 4% + A12(SO4)3 (300 ppm)e0
Outcome
vase lie and quality of flowere0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“sucrose 4% + A12(SO4)3 (300 ppm) and sucrose 4% + CoSO4 (400ppm) were also found better in increasing vase lie and quality of flower over control significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose 4% plus CoSO4 400 ppm significantly improved vase life and flower quality over control.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
sucrose 4% + CoSO4 (400ppm)e0
Outcome
vase lie and quality of flowere0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“sucrose 4% + CoSO4 (400ppm) were also found better in increasing vase lie and quality of flower over control significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose 4% plus A12(SO4)3 300 ppm maximized floret longevity at 4.57 days.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
sucrose 4% + A12(SO4)3 (300ppm.)e0
Outcome
longevity of each florete0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.57 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“longevity of each floret was found maximum (4.57 days) in sucrose 4% + A12(SO4)3 (300ppm.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–475 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: general · GladiolusResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sucrose · pest · GladiolusResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sucrose · quality: postharvest · GladiolusResults agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.