Abstract
A field experiment on sugarcane having treatment combinations of 4 irrigation levels and 6 dates of planting was conducted during 1994–95 and 1995–96 at Chiplima, Sambalpur, on sandy clay-loam soil. Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE recorded maximum plant height, millable canes, plant girth and weight of cane and cane yield (127.31 tonnes/ha). Irrigation and water requirement were also maximum with irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPE, but water-use efficiency was maximum with irrigation at 0.6 IW: CPE. Planting during third week of October was the best with the maximum values of all the yield-attributing characters and the yield. Cane yield declined progressively with successive delay in planting. Water requirement, irrigation requirement and water-use efficiency were also maximum with October planting. The highest cane yield of 156.65 tonnes/ha was recorded from planting sugarcane during the third week of October at 1.2 IW: CPE with corresponding irrigation and water requirement of 132 and 218 cm. Crop extracted more moisture from 0–30 cm in all the treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE gave maximum plant height, millable canes and plant girth in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPEe1
- Outcome
- plant height, millable canes, plant girthe1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Setting
- Chiplima, Sambalpure0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e0“at Chiplima, Sambalpur, on sandy clay-loam soil”
e1“Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE recorded maximum plant height, millable canes, plant girth and weight of cane and cane yield (127.31 tonnes/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE gave the maximum cane yield of 127.31 tonnes/ha.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPEe1
- Outcome
- cane yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 127.31 tonnes/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e1“Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE recorded maximum plant height, millable canes, plant girth and weight of cane and cane yield (127.31 tonnes/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE gave maximum weight of cane in sugarcane.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e1“Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE recorded maximum plant height, millable canes, plant girth and weight of cane and cane yield (127.31 tonnes/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE gave maximum irrigation and water requirement in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPEe2
- Outcome
- Irrigation and water requiremente2
- Direction
- maximume2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e2“Irrigation and water requirement were also maximum with irrigation at 1.2 IW: CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.6 IW:CPE gave maximum water-use efficiency in sugarcane.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e3“water-use efficiency was maximum with irrigation at 0.6 IW: CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting during the third week of October gave the maximum yield-attributing characters and yield of sugarcane.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Planting during third week of Octobere4
- Outcome
- yield-attributing characters and the yielde4
- Direction
- maximume4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e4“Planting during third week of October was the best with the maximum values of all the yield-attributing characters and the yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane yield declined progressively with successive delay in planting.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- successive delay in plantinge5
- Outcome
- Cane yielde5
- Direction
- declined progressivelye5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e5“Cane yield declined progressively with successive delay in planting”
Claim · model-written summary
Water requirement, irrigation requirement and water-use efficiency were maximum with October planting in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- October plantinge6
- Outcome
- Water requirement, irrigation requirement and water-use efficiencye6
- Direction
- maximume6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e6“Water requirement, irrigation requirement and water-use efficiency were also maximum with October planting”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting sugarcane in the third week of October at 1.2 IW: CPE gave the highest cane yield of 156.65 tonnes/ha.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- planting sugarcane during the third week of Octobere7
- Outcome
- cane yielde7
- Direction
- higheste7
- Value
- 156.65 tonnes/hae7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e7“The highest cane yield of 156.65 tonnes/ha was recorded from planting sugarcane during the third week of October at 1.2 IW: CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The best treatment had an irrigation and water requirement of 132 and 218 cm in sugarcane.
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e1“with corresponding irrigation and water requirement of 132 and 218 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop extracted more moisture from 0–30 cm soil in all treatments of sugarcane.
Verbatim
t0“Growth, cane yield and water-use efficiency of sugarcane”
e1“Crop extracted more moisture from 0–30 cm in all the treatments”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.