Paper · 2012 · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)

Plant-Soil Interactions, Weed Control, and Rice Tolerance as Affected by Saflufenacil

Edinalvo Rabaioli Camargo

18
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Saflufenacil is a new herbicide for broadleaf weed control. Limited information is available for crop tolerance, weed control and herbicide behavior in the rice environment. Studies were designed to 1 and 2) evaluate rice tolerance and weed control to saflufenacil in combination with clomazone and imazethapyr; 3) evaluate the absorption and translocation of imazethapyr and saflufenacil in weed species 4) assess saflufenacil degradation and persistence in soils; and 5) investigate the use of reference compounds during the determination of pesticide adsorption (Kd). None or minimal rice injury was observed from preemergence (PRE) application of saflufenacil. Intense injury (68%) was noted with combinations of clomazone (505 g ha-1) applied PRE and saflufenacil (50 g ha-1) applied postemergence (POST). Similarly, rice injury up to 83% was observed in earlier evaluations when saflufenacil was applied POST with imazethapyr. However, subsequent evaluations indicated rice recovery from herbicide treatments. Combination of saflufenacil with imazethapyr resulted in hemp sesbania control ≥ 88% and red rice control of 100%. Rice yield was not adversely altered by the herbicide treatments used in the clomazone and imazethapyr weed control programs. Imazethapyr plus saflufenacil provided a greater uptake (30%) and translocation (35%) of 14C-imazethapyr than imazethapyr alone in the TX4 red rice. Absorption of 14C-saflufenacil ranged from approximately 40 to 60% in hemp sesbania plants. At 12 and 24 hours after treatment a greater percentage of the absorbed saflufenacil was quantified above the treated leaf at the two lower light intensities. Similar trends were observed for basipetal movement of saflufenacil. An accelerated solvent extraction method was developed to extract saflufenacil from soil. Half-life averaged among soils was 59 and 33 days for saturated and field capacity, respectively. Saflufenacil persistence in the environment was 2 to 3 times longer under flooded conditions for most of the studied soils. Adsorption values were affected by soil to solution ratios, particularly when the soil-pesticide interaction resulted in Kd values > than 2 mL g-1. The use of reference compounds during Kd estimation allowed for calculation of a conceptual adsorption window generating a more comprehensive set of data with alternatives for comparison of soils and methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence saflufenacil caused minimal or no rice injury.

Treatment
preemergence (PRE) application of saflufenacile0
Outcome
rice injurye0
Direction
None or minimale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None or minimal rice injury was observed from preemergence (PRE) application of saflufenacil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence clomazone with postemergence saflufenacil caused 68% rice injury.

Treatment
clomazone (505 g ha-1) applied PRE and saflufenacil (50 g ha-1) applied postemergence (POST)e0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
Intensee0
Value
68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intense injury (68%) was noted with combinations of clomazone (505 g ha-1) applied PRE and saflufenacil (50 g ha-1) applied postemergence (POST)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence saflufenacil with imazethapyr caused up to 83% rice injury.

Treatment
saflufenacil was applied POST with imazethapyre0
Outcome
rice injurye0
Value
up to 83%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice injury up to 83% was observed in earlier evaluations when saflufenacil was applied POST with imazethapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–931 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice subsequently recovered from herbicide treatments.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
rice recoverye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“subsequent evaluations indicated rice recovery from herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saflufenacil with imazethapyr controlled hemp sesbania by at least 88%.

Treatment
Combination of saflufenacil with imazethapyre0
Interactor
hemp sesbaniae0weed
Outcome
hemp sesbania controle0
Value
≥ 88%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of saflufenacil with imazethapyr resulted in hemp sesbania control ≥ 88%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saflufenacil with imazethapyr controlled red rice by 100%.

Treatment
saflufenacil with imazethapyre1
Interactor
red ricee0weed
Outcome
red rice controle0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red rice control of 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combination of saflufenacil with imazethapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield was not adversely changed by herbicide treatments in the weed control programs.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
Rice yielde0
Direction
not adversely alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield was not adversely altered by the herbicide treatments used in the clomazone and imazethapyr weed control programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus saflufenacil increased 14C-imazethapyr uptake in TX4 red rice by 30%.

Material
TX4 red ricee0
Treatment
Imazethapyr plus saflufenacile0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
imazethapyr alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr plus saflufenacil provided a greater uptake (30%) and translocation (35%) of 14C-imazethapyr than imazethapyr alone in the TX4 red rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus saflufenacil increased 14C-imazethapyr translocation in TX4 red rice by 35%.

Material
TX4 red ricee0
Treatment
Imazethapyr plus saflufenacile0
Outcome
translocation (35%) of 14C-imazethapyre0
Direction
greatere0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
imazethapyr alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr plus saflufenacil provided a greater uptake (30%) and translocation (35%) of 14C-imazethapyr than imazethapyr alone in the TX4 red rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp sesbania absorbed approximately 40 to 60% of 14C-saflufenacil.

Taxon
hemp sesbaniae0
Outcome
Absorption of 14C-saflufenacile0
Value
approximately 40 to 60%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Absorption of 14C-saflufenacil ranged from approximately 40 to 60% in hemp sesbania plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 and 24 hours, lower light intensities increased upward movement of absorbed saflufenacil.

Taxon
hemp sesbaniae1
Treatment
two lower light intensitiese0
Outcome
percentage of the absorbed saflufenacil was quantified above the treated leafe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
At 12 and 24 hours after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“At 12 and 24 hours after treatment a greater percentage of the absorbed saflufenacil was quantified above the treated leaf at the two lower light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1655 · show in text ↑
e1

“hemp sesbania plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basipetal movement of saflufenacil followed a similar light-intensity pattern.

Taxon
hemp sesbaniae1
Outcome
basipetal movement of saflufenacile0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trends were observed for basipetal movement of saflufenacil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1724 · show in text ↑
e1

“hemp sesbania plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated soil had a mean saflufenacil half-life of 59 days.

Treatment
saturatede0
Outcome
Half-lifee0
Value
59e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Half-life averaged among soils was 59 and 33 days for saturated and field capacity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1912 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field-capacity soil had a mean saflufenacil half-life of 33 days.

Treatment
field capacitye0
Outcome
Half-lifee0
Value
33 dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Half-life averaged among soils was 59 and 33 days for saturated and field capacity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1912 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded conditions prolonged saflufenacil persistence two to threefold for most soils.

Outcome
Saflufenacil persistencee0
Direction
longere0
Value
2 to 3 timese0
Setting
flooded conditionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Saflufenacil persistence in the environment was 2 to 3 times longer under flooded conditions for most of the studied soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2036 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-to-solution ratios affected adsorption estimates especially above Kd of 2 mL g-1.

Outcome
Adsorption valuese0
Qualifier
Kd values > than 2 mL g-1e0
Setting
soil to solution ratiose0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Adsorption values were affected by soil to solution ratios, particularly when the soil-pesticide interaction resulted in Kd values > than 2 mL g-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2184 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reference compounds enabled a conceptual adsorption window and broader soil and method comparisons.

Outcome
conceptual adsorption windowe0
Comparator
comparison of soils and methodse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The use of reference compounds during Kd estimation allowed for calculation of a conceptual adsorption window generating a more comprehensive set of data with alternatives for comparison of soils and methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2393 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An accelerated solvent extraction method was developed for saflufenacil in soil.

Outcome
extract saflufenacil from soile0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“An accelerated solvent extraction method was developed to extract saflufenacil from soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1814 · show in text ↑

saflufenacil · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

saflufenacil · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

clomazone · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Imazethapyr · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Imazethapyr · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 10 positive, 43 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.