Paper · 1971 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Residual Effect of Sorghum and Maize Fertilization on Succeeding Crop of Ground-nut

V. S. Sarma; RR Patil

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a pot culture experiment, response of sorghum (Jowar CSH-1) to the application of iron in shallow black soils of Madhya Pradesh was observed. Availability of soil applied iron was low in these soils. Beneficial effect of soil application of iron was observed in soils where applied iron was available as evidenced by increase in iron concentration of treated plants and where the concentration of iron in plants in control pots was below 205 ppm. No relationship was observed between plant available and extractable iron by different reagents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied iron had low availability.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Outcome
Availability of soil applied irone0
Direction
lowe0
Setting
Madhya Pradeshe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Availability of soil applied iron was low in these soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of sorghum (Jowar CSH-1) to the application of iron in shallow black soils of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron application increased plant iron concentration when available and when control plants had under 205 ppm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Material
Jowar CSH-1e1
Treatment
soil application of irone0
Outcome
iron concentration of treated plantse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
below 205 ppme0
Comparator
control potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beneficial effect of soil application of iron was observed in soils where applied iron was available as evidenced by increase in iron concentration of treated plants and where the concentration of iron in plants in control pots was below 205 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of sorghum (Jowar CSH-1) to the application of iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant available and extractable iron showed no relationship.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
different reagentse0
Outcome
plant available and extractable irone0
Direction
No relationshipe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No relationship was observed between plant available and extractable iron by different reagents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–545 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of sorghum (Jowar CSH-1) to the application of iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–89 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.