application · Nutrient: content · Sorghum
56 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 23
Residual Effect of Sorghum and Maize Fertilization on Succeeding Crop of Ground-nut · 1971
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of micronutrient on yield and nutrient uptake in sorghum · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of salicylic acid on mineral content in Sorghum bicolor (L.) under chromium stress · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
Agronomic Bio-fortification of Zinc in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Genotypes · 2018
- positive
- positive
Evaluation and Utilization of a Chemical Male Gametocide in Sorghum · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Nano Fertilizers on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Soil Microbiology of Kharif Sorghum · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
Phytate reduction in sorghum grains cultivated in Saudi Arabia · 2025
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.