application · Nutrient: content · Sorghum

Positive and negative results24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

56 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19801990200020102020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 23

  1. Residual Effect of Sorghum and Maize Fertilization on Succeeding Crop of Ground-nut · 1971

  2. Effects of some chemical treatments on the recovery from chlorosis in Fe deficiency stressed sorghum cultivars · 1984

  3. Studies on Transpiration Suppressants on Spring Sorghum in North-Western India in Relation to Soil Moisture Regimes. II. Effect on Growth and Nutrient Uptake · 1984

  4. Studies on Transpiration Suppressants on Spring Sorghum in North-Western India in Relation to Soil Moisture Regimes. II. Effect on Growth and Nutrient Uptake · 1984

  5. Bioavailability of Iron, Zinc, Phytate and Phytase Activity during Soaking and Germination of White Sorghum Varieties · 2011

    cited by 1 paper here

  6. Evaluation of the phytochemical and GC-MS analysis of the aqueous seed extract of Aframomum melegueta · 2017

  7. Effect of micronutrient on yield and nutrient uptake in sorghum · 2017

  8. Effect of salicylic acid on mineral content in Sorghum bicolor (L.) under chromium stress · 2017

  9. Unprecedented Synergistic Effects of Nanoscale Nutrients on Growth, Productivity of Sweet Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and Nutrient Biofortification · 2018

  10. Agronomic Bio-fortification of Zinc in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Genotypes · 2018

  11. Evaluation and Utilization of a Chemical Male Gametocide in Sorghum · 2018

  12. Influence of Microbial Consortia on Yield of Kharif Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and Soil Parameters under Rainfed Conditions · 2020

  13. Effect of Zinc Sulfate and Salicylic Acid on Biological Degradation of Phenanthrene in the Cd Polluted Soil under Sorghum Cultivation Inoculated with Pseudomonas Putida · 2020

  14. Evaluation of forage qualities of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under varying jeevamrit formulations and their spraying interval · 2023

  15. Evaluation of forage qualities of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under varying jeevamrit formulations and their spraying interval · 2023

  16. Effect of Nano Fertilizers on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Soil Microbiology of Kharif Sorghum · 2023

  17. Effect of nitrogen application on nutrient content and uptake by sorghum {Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench} · 2025

  18. Effect of soil and foliar application of nitrogen through organic sources on nutrient content and nutrient uptake by sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) · 2025

  19. Impact of Seed hardening, Varying Fertilizer Levels and Organic Foliar Applications on Nutrient Content and Uptake in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) · 2025

  20. Impact of Application of Biofertilizers and Pink Pigmented Facultative Methylotrophs (PPFM) Bacteria on the Soil Properties under Rabi Sorghum Cultivation · 2025

  21. Evaluate effect of mycorrhizal, zinc and iron oxide on root growth, antioxidant enzyme activities, and mineral elements in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) · 2025

  22. Yield, Quality and Nutrient uptake of Fodder Sorghum Influenced by Nitrogen Management and Foliar nutrition in Southern Laterites of Kerala · 2025

  23. Effect of Sorghum Forage Biofortification with Trace Minerals on Forage Quality and Udder Health of Dairy Cattle · 2026

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Phytate reduction in sorghum grains cultivated in Saudi Arabia · 2025

    cites 1 paper here

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Sorghum against other targets

application · nutrient: content on other organisms