Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Concentrations of Zn, Cu and Se were significantly higher in biofortified sorghum fodder than in control.

A claim from Effect of Sorghum Forage Biofortification with Trace Minerals on Forage Quality and Udder Health of Dairy Cattle · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrations of Zn, Cu and Se were significantly higher in biofortified sorghum fodder than in control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Foliar application of Zn, Cu and See2
Outcome
Zn, Cu and See5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multi-cut forage sorghum hybrid Raseela was cultivated in two plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–821
e2

“Foliar application of Zn, Cu and Se significantly improved green fodder and dry matter yield in the biofortified group compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2152
e5

“Concentrations of Ca, P, Mg, Zn, Cu and Se were significantly higher in biofortified fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2267–2358

Title

Effect of Sorghum Forage Biofortification with Trace Minerals on Forage Quality and Udder Health of Dairy Cattle

Nidhi Verma; V. K. Singh; Dharmesh Tewari; et al. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 2026. doi:10.56557/upjoz/2026/v47i105677

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-bc479dbdbcabc32f41a859c97ae4c4e056dfb7b8631eb75a03caa9af0f779513 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

selenium atom · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

copper atom · nutrient: content · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · SorghumResults agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.