Paper · 2015 · Research on Crops

Effect of organic nitrogen sources on growth, yield, quality, water productivity and economics of rice (Oryza sativaL.) under different planting methods in mid-hills of Sikkim Himalayas

Subhash Babu; Raghavendra Singh; R. K. Avasthe; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effect of organic sources of nitrogen on growth, yield, water productivity and economics of rice under different methods of planting in hilly ecosystems of north-east India, an experiment was carried out in kharif seasons of 2013 and 2014 in split plot design with three replications. The results revealed that SRI recorded significantly higher values for all growth parameters (plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, flag leaf length, tillers/m2, root volume and root dry weight), yield attributing characters (productive tillers/m2, panicle length, grains/panicle, filled grains/panicle and test weight), water productivity (kg grain/m3 of water), grain yield and economics over the CP. This caused 36.84 and 29.41, 34 and 28, 60.0 and 55.3% improvement in water productivity, grain yield and net returns over the CP during 2013 and 2014, respectively. Among the organic sources of nitrogen, application of 25% RDN through FYM+25% RDN through VC+25% RDN through PM+25% RDN through MC significantly enhanced the growth, yield attributing characters, water productivity (0.26 and 0.23 kg of grain/water m3), grain yield (3.53 and 3.41 t/ha), net returns (88 x 103 and 83 x 103 Rs./ha) and B: C ratio (1.84 and 1.74) in 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased rice growth and yield components relative to CP.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
all growth parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SRI recorded significantly higher values for all growth parameters (plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, flag leaf length, tillers/m2, root volume and root dry weight), yield attributing characters (productive tillers/m2, panicle length, grains/panicle, filled grains/panicle and test weight), water productivity (kg grain/m3 of water), grain yield and economics over the CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI improved water productivity by 36.84% and 29.41% over CP in 2013 and 2014.

Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
36.84 and 29.41e0
Comparator
CPe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“36.84 and 29.41, 34 and 28, 60.0 and 55.3% improvement in water productivity, grain yield and net returns over the CP during 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI improved grain yield by 34% and 28% over CP in 2013 and 2014.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
34 and 28e0
Comparator
CPe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“34 and 28, 60.0 and 55.3% improvement in water productivity, grain yield and net returns over the CP during 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI improved net returns by 60.0% and 55.3% over CP.

Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
60.0 and 55.3%e0
Comparator
CPe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“60.0 and 55.3% improvement in water productivity, grain yield and net returns over the CP during 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined organic nitrogen treatment enhanced rice growth and yield characters.

Treatment
25% RDN through FYM+25% RDN through VC+25% RDN through PM+25% RDN through MCe0
Outcome
growth, yield attributing characterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 25% RDN through FYM+25% RDN through VC+25% RDN through PM+25% RDN through MC significantly enhanced the growth, yield attributing characters, water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined organic nitrogen treatment enhanced water productivity to 0.26 and 0.23 kg of grain/water m3.

Outcome
water productivitye0
Value
0.26 and 0.23 kg of grain/water m3e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity (0.26 and 0.23 kg of grain/water m3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined organic nitrogen treatment enhanced grain yield to 3.53 and 3.41 t/ha.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
3.53 and 3.41 t/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (3.53 and 3.41 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined organic nitrogen treatment enhanced net returns to 88 x 103 and 83 x 103 Rs./ha.

Outcome
net returnse0
Value
88 x 103 and 83 x 103 Rs./hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns (88 x 103 and 83 x 103 Rs./ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined organic nitrogen treatment enhanced the B: C ratio to 1.84 and 1.74.

Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Value
1.84 and 1.74e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B: C ratio (1.84 and 1.74)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.