Paper · 2010 · The Agriculturists

Maize Production and Soil Properties Change in Alley Cropping System at Different Nitrogen Levels

Md Abiar Rahman; Md Giashuddin Miah; Hisashi Yahata

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Productivity of maize and soil properties change under alley cropping system consisting of four woody species (Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala, Cajanus cajan and Senna siamea) at different nitrogen levels (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of recommended rate) were studied in the floodplain ecosystem of Bangladesh. Comparative growth performance of four woody species after pruning showed that L. leucocephala attained the highest height, while C. cajan produced the maximum number of branches. Higher and almost similar amount of pruned materials (PM) were obtained from S. siamea, G. sepium and C. cajan species. In general, maize yield increased with the increase in N level irrespective of added PM. However, 100% N plus PM, 75% N plus PM and 100% N without PM (control) produced similar yields. The grain yield of maize obtained from G. sepium alley was 2.82, 4.13 and 5.81% higher over those of L. leucocephala, C. cajan and S. siamea, respectively. Across the alley, only one row of maize in the vicinity of the woody species was affected significantly. There was an increasing trend in soil properties in terms of organic C, total N and CEC in alley cropping treatments especially in G. sepium and L. leucocephala alleys compared to the initial and control soils. Therefore, one fourth chemical N fertilizer can be saved without significant yield loss in maize production in alley cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leucaena leucocephala attained the highest height among the woody species after pruning.

Taxon
L. leucocephalaLeucaena leucocephalae1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucaena leucocephala
Leucaena leucocephala · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“L. leucocephala attained the highest height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cajanus cajan produced the maximum number of branches.

Taxon
C. cajanCajanus cajane1
Outcome
number of branchese1
Direction
maximume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“C. cajan produced the maximum number of branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senna siamea yielded higher amounts of pruned materials.

Taxon
S. siameaSenna siameae1
Outcome
pruned materials (PM)e1
Direction
Highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Senna siamea
Senna siamea · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Higher and almost similar amount of pruned materials (PM) were obtained from S. siamea, G. sepium and C. cajan species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–613 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia sepium yielded higher amounts of pruned materials.

Taxon
G. sepiumGliricidia sepiume1
Outcome
pruned materials (PM)e1
Direction
Highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Higher and almost similar amount of pruned materials (PM) were obtained from S. siamea, G. sepium and C. cajan species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–613 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cajanus cajan yielded higher amounts of pruned materials.

Taxon
C. cajanCajanus cajane1
Outcome
pruned materials (PM)e1
Direction
Highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Higher and almost similar amount of pruned materials (PM) were obtained from S. siamea, G. sepium and C. cajan species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield increased with nitrogen level irrespective of added pruned material.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
increase in N levele1
Outcome
maize yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
irrespective of added PMe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize yield increased with the increase in N level irrespective of added PM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yields with 100% N plus PM, 75% N plus PM and 100% N without PM were similar.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100% N plus PM, 75% N plus PMe1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
100% N without PM (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Production and Soil Properties Change in Alley Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% N plus PM, 75% N plus PM and 100% N without PM (control) produced similar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield from the G. sepium alley was 2.82 higher than from the L. leucocephala alley.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
G. sepium alleye1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.82e1
Comparator
L. leucocephalae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Production and Soil Properties Change in Alley Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The grain yield of maize obtained from G. sepium alley was 2.82, 4.13 and 5.81% higher over those of L. leucocephala, C. cajan and S. siamea, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield from the G. sepium alley was 4.13 higher than from the C. cajan alley.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
G. sepium alleye1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
4.13e1
Comparator
C. cajane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Production and Soil Properties Change in Alley Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The grain yield of maize obtained from G. sepium alley was 2.82, 4.13 and 5.81% higher over those of L. leucocephala, C. cajan and S. siamea, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield from the G. sepium alley was 5.81 higher than from the S. siamea alley.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
G. sepium alleye1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
5.81e1
Comparator
S. siameae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Production and Soil Properties Change in Alley Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The grain yield of maize obtained from G. sepium alley was 2.82, 4.13 and 5.81% higher over those of L. leucocephala, C. cajan and S. siamea, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–954 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one maize row near the woody species was significantly affected.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
woody speciese1
Outcome
row of maizee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Production and Soil Properties Change in Alley Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“only one row of maize in the vicinity of the woody species was affected significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alley cropping increased soil organic C, total N and CEC relative to initial and control soils.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
alley cropping treatmentse1
Outcome
organic C, total N and CECe1
Direction
increasing trende1
Comparator
initial and control soilse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Production and Soil Properties Change in Alley Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was an increasing trend in soil properties in terms of organic C, total N and CEC in alley cropping treatments especially in G. sepium and L. leucocephala alleys compared to the initial and control soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1270 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

One fourth of chemical N fertiliser can be saved in maize production under alley cropping without significant yield loss.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
chemical N fertilizere1
Qualifier
without significant yield losse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“one fourth chemical N fertilizer can be saved without significant yield loss in maize production in alley cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1404 · show in text ↑

Gliricidia sepium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.