Paper · 2003 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of integrated use of organic manure, green manure and fertilizer nitrogen on sustaining productivity of Rabi sorghum-chickpea system and fertility of a vertisol

S. I. Tolanur; V.P. Badanur

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of integrated use of organic manure, green manure and fertilizer N on nutrients status of soil and productivity of rabi sorghum-chickpea system was studied in a field experiment conducted during 1996–97 and 1997–98 with various treatment combinations including FYM, compost, vermi-compost, green manure and fertilizer N. The differences in organic carbon, available N, P and K were significantly influenced. The organic carbon and available N status declined with application of fertilizer N alone and increased with conjunctive use of fertilizer N and organic manure. The combined application of organic and inorganic N sustained the productivity. Soil available nutrients like N, P and K increased significantly with the application of various organic sources of nutrients in combination with fertilizers over the fertilizer alone. The highest grain yield of rabi sorghum and chickpea was obtained with 50 per cent N through green manure plus 50 per cent fertilizer N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N alone reduced soil organic carbon and available N.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
fertilizer N alonee0
Outcome
organic carbon and available N statuse0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum-chickpea system”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The organic carbon and available N status declined with application of fertilizer N alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer N and organic manure increased organic carbon and available N.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
conjunctive use of fertilizer N and organic manuree0
Outcome
organic carbon and available N statuse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
fertilizer N alonee0

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum-chickpea system”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“organic carbon and available N status declined with application of fertilizer N alone and increased with conjunctive use of fertilizer N and organic manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and inorganic N sustained productivity.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
combined application of organic and inorganic Ne0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
sustainede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum-chickpea system”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined application of organic and inorganic N sustained the productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient sources with fertilizer significantly increased soil available N, P and K over fertilizer alone.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
various organic sources of nutrients in combination with fertilizerse0
Outcome
Soil available nutrients like N, P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum-chickpea system”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil available nutrients like N, P and K increased significantly with the application of various organic sources of nutrients in combination with fertilizers over the fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half green manure N plus half fertilizer N gave the highest rabi sorghum grain yield.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
50 per cent N through green manure plus 50 per cent fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
grain yield of rabi sorghume0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum-chickpea system”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest grain yield of rabi sorghum and chickpea was obtained with 50 per cent N through green manure plus 50 per cent fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half green manure N plus half fertilizer N gave the highest chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
50 per cent N through green manure plus 50 per cent fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
grain yield of rabi sorghum and chickpeae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum-chickpea system”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest grain yield of rabi sorghum and chickpea was obtained with 50 per cent N through green manure plus 50 per cent fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–980 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

118 papers: 111 positive, 7 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.