Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Production Potential and Economic Analysis of Indian Mustard Var. Vardan Under Different Levels of Nitrogen and Sulphur

Amit Kumar; Sandeep Kumar

9
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004 to study the effect of different levels of nitrogen (0, 60, 80,100,120 and 140 kg/ha) and sulphur (0, 20,40 and 60 kg/ha) on yield and various yield characters as well as the economics of growing mustard. Nitrogen application had significantly increased all the yield contributing characters viz. number of pods/plants, pod length, number of seeds,seed weight/plant and test weight whereas the sulphur levels had increased significantly only the number of pods/plant and number of seeds/pod. The higher level of nitrogen had significantly increased the grain yield, stick and straw yield, whereas none of them was affected by higher level of sulphur. Neither nitrogen nor sulphur doses affected the harvest index significanty. The maximum net return of Rs 30 940/ha was obtained with fertilizer application of 120 kg N/ha + 20 kg S/ha which gave the cost benefit ratio of 1:2.58 against net return of only Rs 9340/ha with 1:1.02 cost benefit ratio under control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased number of pods/plants, pod length and number of seeds of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
number of pods/plants, pod length, number of seedse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen application had significantly increased all the yield contributing characters viz. number of pods/plants, pod length, number of seeds,seed weight/plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased seed weight per plant and test weight of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
seed weight/plant and test weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen application had significantly increased all the yield contributing characters viz. number of pods/plants, pod length, number of seeds,seed weight/plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur levels significantly increased number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
sulphur levelse2
Outcome
number of pods/plant and number of seeds/pode2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“the sulphur levels had increased significantly only the number of pods/plant and number of seeds/pod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher nitrogen level significantly increased grain yield, stick yield and straw yield of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
higher level of nitrogene3
Outcome
grain yield, stick and straw yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The higher level of nitrogen had significantly increased the grain yield, stick and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher sulphur level did not affect grain, stick or straw yield of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
higher level of sulphure4
Outcome
grain yield, stick and straw yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The higher level of nitrogen had significantly increased the grain yield, stick and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–693 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas none of them was affected by higher level of sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not affect the harvest index of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
nitrogene5
Outcome
harvest indexe5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“Neither nitrogen nor sulphur doses affected the harvest index significanty”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur doses did not affect the harvest index of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
sulphur dosese5
Outcome
harvest indexe5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“Neither nitrogen nor sulphur doses affected the harvest index significanty”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application of 120 kg N/ha + 20 kg S/ha gave the maximum net return of Indian mustard, Rs 30 940/ha, compared with the control.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
fertilizer application of 120 kg N/ha + 20 kg S/hae6
Outcome
net returne6
Direction
maximume6
Value
Rs 30 940/hae6
Qualifier
Rs 9340/hae7
Comparator
controle7
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum net return of Rs 30 940/ha was obtained with fertilizer application of 120 kg N/ha + 20 kg S/ha which gave the cost benefit ratio of 1:2.58”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–984 · show in text ↑
e7

“against net return of only Rs 9340/ha with 1:1.02 cost benefit ratio under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cost benefit ratio of 120 kg N/ha + 20 kg S/ha was 1:2.58, higher than the control at 1:1.02.

Taxon
Indian MustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
120 kg N/ha + 20 kg S/hae6
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe6
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
1:2.58e6
Qualifier
1:1.02e7
Comparator
controle7
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian Mustard Var. Vardan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out with Indian mustard Var. Vardan sown during winter season of 2003–2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum net return of Rs 30 940/ha was obtained with fertilizer application of 120 kg N/ha + 20 kg S/ha which gave the cost benefit ratio of 1:2.58”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–984 · show in text ↑
e7

“against net return of only Rs 9340/ha with 1:1.02 cost benefit ratio under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1067 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 138 positive, 1 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

135 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.