Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed Management in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Special Reference to Asphodehs tenuifolius

B. L. Poonia; Navin Jain; Shristi Singh

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 at Navgaon (Alwar) to assess the comparative performance of different control measures against weeds with special reference to Asphodelus tenuifolius in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Results revealed that stale seedbed significantly improved yield attributes and enhanced grain, straw yield and net returns due to reduction in weed biomass (WCE 51%). Post-em. 2,4-D (amine) at 0.75 kg ha−1 recorded the lowest weed biomass (WCE 91.4%) and the highest yield attributes as well as grain, straw yield and net returns compared with other weed control measures, followed by hand weeding 35 DAS (WCE 80.0%) and a tank mixed 2.4-D (0.375 kg ha−1)+isoproturon (0.50 kg ha−1) (WCE 89.4%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stale seedbed reduced weed biomass in wheat (WCE 51%)

Treatment
stale seedbede1
Interactor
Asphodelus tenuifoliusAsphodelus tenuifoliuse0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
reductione1
Value
WCE 51%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Asphodelus tenuifolius
Asphodelus tenuifolius · InteractorKhalid Mahmood · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 at Navgaon (Alwar) to assess the comparative performance of different control measures against weeds with special reference to Asphodelus tenuifolius in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e1

“stale seedbed significantly improved yield attributes and enhanced grain, straw yield and net returns due to reduction in weed biomass (WCE 51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stale seedbed enhanced grain yield, straw yield and net returns of wheat

Treatment
stale seedbede1
Outcome
grain, straw yield and net returnse1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 at Navgaon (Alwar) to assess the comparative performance of different control measures against weeds with special reference to Asphodelus tenuifolius in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e1

“stale seedbed significantly improved yield attributes and enhanced grain, straw yield and net returns due to reduction in weed biomass (WCE 51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence 2,4-D (amine) at 0.75 kg ha−1 gave the lowest weed biomass in wheat (WCE 91.4%)

Treatment
Post-em. 2,4-D (amine) at 0.75 kg ha−1e2
Interactor
Asphodelus tenuifoliusAsphodelus tenuifoliuse0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse2
Direction
loweste2
Value
WCE 91.4%e2
Comparator
other weed control measurese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Asphodelus tenuifolius
Asphodelus tenuifolius · InteractorKhalid Mahmood · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 at Navgaon (Alwar) to assess the comparative performance of different control measures against weeds with special reference to Asphodelus tenuifolius in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e2

“Post-em. 2,4-D (amine) at 0.75 kg ha−1 recorded the lowest weed biomass (WCE 91.4%) and the highest yield attributes as well as grain, straw yield and net returns compared with other weed control measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence 2,4-D (amine) at 0.75 kg ha−1 gave the highest yield attributes, grain, straw yield and net returns of wheat

Treatment
Post-em. 2,4-D (amine) at 0.75 kg ha−1e2
Outcome
yield attributese2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
other weed control measurese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 at Navgaon (Alwar) to assess the comparative performance of different control measures against weeds with special reference to Asphodelus tenuifolius in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e2

“Post-em. 2,4-D (amine) at 0.75 kg ha−1 recorded the lowest weed biomass (WCE 91.4%) and the highest yield attributes as well as grain, straw yield and net returns compared with other weed control measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 35 DAS gave a weed control efficiency of 80.0% in wheat

Treatment
hand weeding 35 DASe3
Outcome
WCEe3
Value
80.0%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 at Navgaon (Alwar) to assess the comparative performance of different control measures against weeds with special reference to Asphodelus tenuifolius in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e3

“followed by hand weeding 35 DAS (WCE 80.0%) and a tank mixed 2.4-D (0.375 kg ha−1)+isoproturon (0.50 kg ha−1) (WCE 89.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–760 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixture of 2,4-D and isoproturon gave a weed control efficiency of 89.4% in wheat

Treatment
a tank mixed 2.4-D (0.375 kg ha−1)+isoproturon (0.50 kg ha−1)e3
Outcome
WCEe3
Value
89.4%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 at Navgaon (Alwar) to assess the comparative performance of different control measures against weeds with special reference to Asphodelus tenuifolius in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e3

“followed by hand weeding 35 DAS (WCE 80.0%) and a tank mixed 2.4-D (0.375 kg ha−1)+isoproturon (0.50 kg ha−1) (WCE 89.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–760 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

amine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.