Paper · 1995 · Journal of Entomological Research

Efficacy of neem derivatives as rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper, Nephotettix virescens (Distant) under greenhouse conditions

Abhiram Dash; B. Senapati

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The pest control potentialities of neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) and neem cake extract (NCE) as rice seedling root-dip (SRD) against green leaf hopper (GLH), Nephotettix virescens (Dist.), during 1990 and 1991 summer seasons, were investigation under greenhouse conditions. The treatments indicated marked reduction in survival of the nymphs and adult emergence, prolongation in the duration of nymphal period and low growth indices. Among neem products, NCE 10% + 1% urea was most effective resulting in lowest adult emergence (13.34%) and growth index (0.76) followed by NSKE 5% + 1% urea which resulted in 20.0% adult emergence with 1.14 growth index as against 85% and 5.49 in untreated control, respectively. However, chlorpyriphos SRD treatment at 0.02% was superior to neem products against GLH, the corresponding figures being 5.0% and 0.28. The adverse effect of neem products on GLH was more pronounced at higher concentration than at lower concentration. At NSKE 2.5% + 1% urea and NCE 5% + 1% urea, the nymphs becoming adults and the growth indices were 43.33 and 28.34 per cent, and 2.55 and 1.62, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem root dips reduced green leaf hopper nymph survival and adult emergence, prolonged nymphal development and lowered growth indices.

Treatment
rice seedling root-dipt0
Interactor
green leaf hoppert0pest
Outcome
survival of the nymphs and adult emergencee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments indicated marked reduction in survival of the nymphs and adult emergence, prolongation in the duration of nymphal period and low growth indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NCE 10% plus urea yielded 13.34% adult emergence.

Treatment
NCE 10% + 1% ureae0
Interactor
green leaf hoppert0pest
Outcome
adult emergencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NCE 10% + 1% urea was most effective resulting in lowest adult emergence (13.34%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NCE 10% plus urea yielded a growth index of 0.76.

Treatment
NCE 10% + 1% ureae0
Interactor
green leaf hoppert0pest
Outcome
growth indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.76e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NCE 10% + 1% urea was most effective resulting in lowest adult emergence (13.34%) and growth index (0.76)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE 5% plus urea yielded 20.0% adult emergence.

Treatment
NSKE 5% + 1% ureae0
Interactor
green leaf hoppert0pest
Outcome
adult emergencee0
Value
20.0%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NSKE 5% + 1% urea which resulted in 20.0% adult emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE 5% plus urea yielded a 1.14 growth index.

Treatment
NSKE 5% + 1% ureae0
Interactor
green leaf hoppert0pest
Outcome
growth indexe0
Value
1.14e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NSKE 5% + 1% urea which resulted in 20.0% adult emergence with 1.14 growth index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos root dip was superior to neem products against green leaf hopper.

Treatment
chlorpyriphos SRD treatment at 0.02%e0
Interactor
green leaf hoppert0pest
Outcome
against GLHe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
neem productse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorpyriphos SRD treatment at 0.02% was superior to neem products against GLH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–80 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem products affected green leaf hopper more strongly at higher concentration.

Treatment
neem productse0
Interactor
green leaf hoppert0pest
Outcome
adverse effect of neem products on GLHe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
lower concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adverse effect of neem products on GLH was more pronounced at higher concentration than at lower concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedling root-dip against green leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–80 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azadirachta indica · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 78 positive, 8 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

botanical · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

211 papers: 133 positive, 78 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

207 papers more in this group

See all 211 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.