Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of Ammonium Nitrate and Monosodium Glutamate in Waste Water on the Growth, Antioxidant Activity, and Nitrogen Assimilation of Lettuce (Lactuca sativaL.)

Maryam Haghighi; Ping Fang; Mohammad Pessarakli

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that the uptake of organic as opposed to inorganic nitrogen compounds found in wastewater can be properly substituted for plant nutrients. The objective of this study was to compare effects of applying monosodium glutamate wastewater (MGW) and ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) (AN) on nitrogen metabolism and growth of lettuce. The results showed that while NH4NO3 (AN), NO3-, nitrite content and NR activity increased the protein content of lettuce. Applying MGW with a high concentration of 17 amino acids and macro- and microelements improved the fresh weights of shoot and root as well as the protein content of lettuce. Antioxidant activities were not affected by AN and MGW, and their interaction effects only increased POD after 8 weeks. In conclusion, substituting a portion of the chemical fertilizers with MGW improved lettuce growth, but did not increase NO3- accumulation in leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate increased lettuce protein content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
NH4NO3 (AN)e0
Outcome
protein content of lettucee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“NH4NO3 (AN), NO3-, nitrite content and NR activity increased the protein content of lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monosodium glutamate wastewater improved lettuce shoot and root fresh weights.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
shoot and roote0
Treatment
Applying MGWe0
Outcome
fresh weights of shoot and roote0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applying MGW with a high concentration of 17 amino acids and macro- and microelements improved the fresh weights of shoot and root as well as the protein content of lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monosodium glutamate wastewater improved lettuce protein content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Applying MGWe0
Outcome
protein content of lettucee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applying MGW with a high concentration of 17 amino acids and macro- and microelements improved the fresh weights of shoot and root as well as the protein content of lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither ammonium nitrate nor monosodium glutamate wastewater affected antioxidant activities.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
AN and MGWe0
Outcome
Antioxidant activitiese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Antioxidant activities were not affected by AN and MGW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of ammonium nitrate and wastewater increased POD after eight weeks.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
their interaction effectse0
Outcome
PODe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 8 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“their interaction effects only increased POD after 8 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting some chemical fertilizer with wastewater improved lettuce growth.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
substituting a portion of the chemical fertilizers with MGWe0
Outcome
lettuce growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“substituting a portion of the chemical fertilizers with MGW improved lettuce growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting some chemical fertilizer with wastewater did not increase nitrate accumulation in leaves.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
substituting a portion of the chemical fertilizers with MGWe0
Outcome
NO3- accumulation in leavese0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“substituting a portion of the chemical fertilizers with MGW improved lettuce growth, but did not increase NO3- accumulation in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–912 · show in text ↑

monosodium glutamate · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 51 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

248 papers: 202 positive, 46 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

244 papers more in this group

See all 248 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.