Abstract
Lettuce is a plant that is quite popular with the public. Not only does it have economic value but it also has quite high nutritional content. So one method used to maintain the stability of lettuce production on the market is by providing rice husk ash and monosodium glutamate (MSG). This research uses a non-factorial randomized block design (RAK) which consists of 5 levels, namely giving fertilizer without combination and giving combined fertilizer, namely P1 (Rice husk ash 100 grams/polybag), P2 (MSG 15 grams/polybag), P3 (Combination of rice husk ash and MSG with a dose ratio of 100 grams of rice husk ash : 15 grams of MSG), P4 (Combination of rice husk ash and MSG with a dose ratio of 75 grams of rice husk ash : 10 grams of MSG), P5 (Combination of rice husk ash and MSG with a dose ratio of 50 grams of rice husk ash: 5 grams of MSG). The study's findings demonstrated a significant impact on all parameters (plant height, number of leaves, leaf area index, and plant fresh weight) when a combination of rice husk ash and MSG was used. The results of testing the levels of chlorophyll a b and the total use of a combination of rice husk ash and MSG did not provide a significant effect. The most effective dose to increase the growth of lettuce plants was the use of a combination of rice husk ash and MSG with a level of P3 = 100 grams of rice husk ash: 15 grams of MSG.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Combined rice husk ash and MSG significantly affected plant height, leaf number, leaf area index and fresh weight.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa L.
Lactuca sativat0 - Treatment
- a combination of rice husk ash and MSGe0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves, leaf area index, and plant fresh weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study's findings demonstrated a significant impact on all parameters (plant height, number of leaves, leaf area index, and plant fresh weight) when a combination of rice husk ash and MSG was used.”
t0“Lactuca sativa L.”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture had no significant effect on chlorophyll a, b and total levels.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
- Treatment
- a combination of rice husk ash and MSGe0
- Outcome
- levels of chlorophyll a b and the totale0
- Direction
- did not provide a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results of testing the levels of chlorophyll a b and the total use of a combination of rice husk ash and MSG did not provide a significant effect.”
t0“Lactuca sativa L.”
Claim · model-written summary
P3 was identified as the most effective mixture for increasing lettuce growth.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
- Treatment
- P3 = 100 grams of rice husk ash: 15 grams of MSGe0
- Outcome
- growth of lettuce plantse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most effective dose to increase the growth of lettuce plants was the use of a combination of rice husk ash and MSG with a level of P3 = 100 grams of rice husk ash: 15 grams of MSG.”
t0“Lactuca sativa L.”
The same questions in other papers
Oryza sativa · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →monosodium glutamate · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.