Paper · 2020 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Application of Rice Husk Silicate Extract to Increment Growth of Indoor Hydroponic Lettuce

B Frasetya; P Rahmatullah; M Subandi

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The utilization of backyard or front yard for the cultivation of lettuce under hydroponics system is faced with a limited sunlight duration obtained by plants due to the shadow of buildings and other city infrastructure. This research aimed to overcome the limited sunlight by supporting various concentrations of rice husk extract. The experimental research method was used by a complete randomized design consisted of four treatments: A = without the application of silica extract, B = 10%, C = 20% and D = 30% silica extract of rice husk. Each treatment was repeated six times so that there were 24 experimental units obtained. The parameters measured were the main parameters (plant height, number of leaves, plant fresh weight) and secondary parameters (room temperature, room humidity, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), nutrient volume). The data were then analyzed by variance analysis at 5% significant level and Duncan multiple range test at 5% significant level. The results showed that the application of rice husk silica extract 10-30% concentration was not significantly different compared to without the application of rice husk silica extract. The application of rice husk silica extract has not been able to increase the growth of lettuce in conditions of light intensity lower than 4,500 lx.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk silica extract at 10–30% did not significantly differ from no extract for lettuce growth.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
application of rice husk silica extract 10-30% concentratione0
Outcome
growth of lettucee1
Comparator
without the application of rice husk silica extracte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the application of rice husk silica extract 10-30% concentration was not significantly different compared to without the application of rice husk silica extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of lettuce in conditions of light intensity lower than 4,500 lx.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk silica extract did not increase lettuce growth below 4,500 lx.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
rice husk silica extracte0
Outcome
growth of lettucee0
Direction
not been able to increasee0
Qualifier
light intensity lower than 4,500 lxe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of rice husk silica extract has not been able to increase the growth of lettuce in conditions of light intensity lower than 4,500 lx.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1317 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Oryza sativa · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

botanical · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 114 positive, 157 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.