Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Gamari, Agra, Uttar Pradesh during the winter (rabi) season of 2009–10 and 2010–11 on phosphate-deficient soil, to study the combined effect of rockphosphate (RP) with molybdenum and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) on yield and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) and soil fertility. Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g). The lentil crop responded significantly up to 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate and increased the grain and straw yields by 17.2 and 19.8% respectively. Application of 2 kg Mo/ha proved superior to the control with respect to grain and straw yields. Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved the yield of lentil significantly over the control. The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation. The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control. Maximum net returns (63,150/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (4.30) were obtained with 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata and 30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation respectively. The P-use efficiency decreased and apparent P recovery increased with increasing dose of phosphorus.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment produced taller plants (49 cm).
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- plantse0
- Direction
- tallere0
- Value
- 49 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment produced highest branches/plant (10.4).
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- branches/plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10.4e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment produced highest pods/plant (103.5).
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- pods/plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 103.5e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment produced highest test weight (28.5 g).
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- test weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 28.5 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rock phosphate increased grain yield by 17.2%.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphatee0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 17.2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lentil crop responded significantly up to 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate and increased the grain and straw yields by 17.2 and 19.8% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rock phosphate increased straw yield by 19.8%.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphatee0
- Outcome
- strawe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 19.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lentil crop responded significantly up to 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate and increased the grain and straw yields by 17.2 and 19.8% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum application improved grain and straw yields over control.
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 2 kg Mo/hae0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yieldse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of 2 kg Mo/ha proved superior to the control with respect to grain and straw yields.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha improved lentil yield over control.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/hae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- yield of lentile0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved the yield of lentil significantly over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved lentil yield over control.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphatee0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- yield of lentile0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved the yield of lentil significantly over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave maximum grain (1.75 t/ha).
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1.75 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave maximum straw (3.9 t/ha).
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- strawe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.9 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave maximum protein content.
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved utilization of nutrients by lentil.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- utilization of nutrients by lentile0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved available N to 166 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- available Ne0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 166 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved P to 13 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 13 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved Mo to 0.074 mg/kg.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- Moe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 0.074 mg/kge0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata gave maximum net returns of 63,150/ha.
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striatae0
- Interactor
- P. striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 63,150/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Maximum net returns (63,150/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (4.30) were obtained with 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata and 30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation respectively.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation gave maximum benefit: cost ratio of 4.30.
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- 30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculatione0
- Interactor
- P. striata
Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont - Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 4.30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Maximum net returns (63,150/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (4.30) were obtained with 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata and 30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation respectively.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
P-use efficiency decreased as phosphorus dose rose.
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- increasing dose of phosphoruse0
- Outcome
- P-use efficiencye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The P-use efficiency decreased and apparent P recovery increased with increasing dose of phosphorus.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
apparent P recovery increased as phosphorus dose rose.
- Taxon
- lentil (Lens culinaris)
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- increasing dose of phosphoruse0
- Outcome
- apparent P recoverye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The P-use efficiency decreased and apparent P recovery increased with increasing dose of phosphorus.”
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas putida · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas putida · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
molybdenum atom · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →molybdenum atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →phosphorus · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.