Paper · 2014 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of integrated use of rock phosphate, molybdenum and phosphate solubilizing bacteria on lentil (Lens culinaris) in an alluvial soil

Sandeep Singh; Harvendra Singh; Seema; et al.

20
claims
32
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Gamari, Agra, Uttar Pradesh during the winter (rabi) season of 2009–10 and 2010–11 on phosphate-deficient soil, to study the combined effect of rockphosphate (RP) with molybdenum and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) on yield and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) and soil fertility. Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g). The lentil crop responded significantly up to 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate and increased the grain and straw yields by 17.2 and 19.8% respectively. Application of 2 kg Mo/ha proved superior to the control with respect to grain and straw yields. Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved the yield of lentil significantly over the control. The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation. The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control. Maximum net returns (63,150/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (4.30) were obtained with 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata and 30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation respectively. The P-use efficiency decreased and apparent P recovery increased with increasing dose of phosphorus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced taller plants (49 cm).

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
tallere0
Value
49 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced highest branches/plant (10.4).

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
branches/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced highest pods/plant (103.5).

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
pods/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
103.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced highest test weight (28.5 g).

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
28.5 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata recorded significantly taller plants (49 cm), highest branches/plant (10.4), pods/plant (103.5) and test weight (28.5 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate increased grain yield by 17.2%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphatee0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lentil crop responded significantly up to 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate and increased the grain and straw yields by 17.2 and 19.8% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate increased straw yield by 19.8%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphatee0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lentil crop responded significantly up to 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate and increased the grain and straw yields by 17.2 and 19.8% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum application improved grain and straw yields over control.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
2 kg Mo/hae0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2 kg Mo/ha proved superior to the control with respect to grain and straw yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha improved lentil yield over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/hae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
yield of lentile0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved the yield of lentil significantly over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved lentil yield over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphatee0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
yield of lentile0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with 2 kg Mo/ha or 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate improved the yield of lentil significantly over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave maximum grain (1.75 t/ha).

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
graine0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.75 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave maximum straw (3.9 t/ha).

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.9 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave maximum protein content.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain (1.75 t/ha) and straw (3.9 t/ha) yields, and protein content were recorded with conjunctive use of 60 kg P2O5/ha as rockphosphate + 2 kg Mo/ha + Pseudomonas striata inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved utilization of nutrients by lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
utilization of nutrients by lentile0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved available N to 166 kg/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
improvede0
Value
166 kg/hae0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved P to 13 kg/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
13 kg/hae0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved Mo to 0.074 mg/kg.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striatae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
Moe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
0.074 mg/kge0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The utilization of nutrients by lentil and status of available N (166 kg/ha), P (13 kg/ha) and Mo (0.074 mg/kg) improved significantly owing to P source + Mo + inoculation with Pseudomonas striata over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata gave maximum net returns of 63,150/ha.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striatae0
Interactor
P. striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
63,150/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum net returns (63,150/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (4.30) were obtained with 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata and 30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation gave maximum benefit: cost ratio of 4.30.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculatione0
Interactor
P. striataPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
4.30e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum net returns (63,150/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (4.30) were obtained with 60 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo/ha + P. striata and 30 kg P2O5 + 2 kg Mo + P. striata inoculation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-use efficiency decreased as phosphorus dose rose.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
increasing dose of phosphoruse0
Outcome
P-use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P-use efficiency decreased and apparent P recovery increased with increasing dose of phosphorus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

apparent P recovery increased as phosphorus dose rose.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
increasing dose of phosphoruse0
Outcome
apparent P recoverye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P-use efficiency decreased and apparent P recovery increased with increasing dose of phosphorus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas putida · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

molybdenum atom · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.