Paper · 2019 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

The impact of foliage fertilization of iron and molybdenum on yield, N uptake and root nodulation of lentil (Lens Culinaris Medic) crop

Jamal Nasar; Roshan Ali; Ashfaq Alam; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was established to study the impact of foliage fertilization of microelements (Fe and Mo) on lentil at the Agricultural Research Farm Mingora, Swat, Pakistan in 2016-17. All the treatments were assigned in random block design. The results showed that iron (Fe) and molybdenum (Mo) significantly improved the yield and quality of lentil crop. Based on the obtained results, the majority of the parameters increased with the combined application of Fe and Mo. The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration. Results further revealed that Mo at the rate of 100 g ha-1 significantly enhanced the number of nodules (9.13 plant-1) and active nodules (8.03plant-1). These results suggested that Fe and Mo in optimal amount solely or as a blend considerably improve the growth, yield and quality of lentil crop and is therefore recommended for the better production of lentil crop in the agro-climatic condition of Swat valley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and Mo application produced maximum lentil grain yield of 1361 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1361 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and Mo application produced maximum lentil biological yield of 3126 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3126 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and Mo application produced maximum lentil 1000 grain weight of 54.62 g.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
54.62 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and Mo application produced lentil protein content of 30%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
protein percente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
30 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and Mo application produced lentil N uptake of 65.32 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
65.32 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and Mo application produced lentil Fe concentration of 48.33 mg/g.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
48.33 mg/ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and Mo application produced lentil Mo concentration of 5.07 mg/g.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
Moe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.07 mg/ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Fe and Mo at 500 and 100 g ha-1 produced the maximum grain yield (1361 kg ha-1), biological yield (3126 kg ha-1), 1000 grain weight (54.62 g), protein percent (30 %), N uptake (65.32 kg ha-1), Fe (48.33 mg/g) and Mo (5.07 mg/g) concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo at 100 g ha-1 increased lentil nodule number to 9.13 plant-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Mo at the rate of 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
9.13 plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results further revealed that Mo at the rate of 100 g ha-1 significantly enhanced the number of nodules (9.13 plant-1) and active nodules (8.03plant-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo at 100 g ha-1 increased lentil active nodule number to 8.03plant-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Mo at the rate of 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
active nodulese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.03plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results further revealed that Mo at the rate of 100 g ha-1 significantly enhanced the number of nodules (9.13 plant-1) and active nodules (8.03plant-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimal Fe and Mo fertilization for lentil production in Swat valley.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
better production of lentil crope0
Setting
Swat valleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggested that Fe and Mo in optimal amount solely or as a blend considerably improve the growth, yield and quality of lentil crop and is therefore recommended for the better production of lentil crop in the agro-climatic condition of Swat valley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–107 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

molybdenum atom · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.