Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation was most effective for grain yield.

A claim from Effect of Iron and Urea Application on Iron Biofortification of Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation was most effective for grain yield.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95
e0

“The results of the study revealed that the combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stages was the most effective in enhancing grain yield, Fe and zinc (Zn) concentration in plants (at flowering as well as pod formation stage), stover and grain (whole and split).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–918

Title

Effect of Iron and Urea Application on Iron Biofortification of Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)

Amandeep Kaur; Guriqbal Singh; Kuldeep Singh; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2023. doi:10.1080/00103624.2023.2254330

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-edb0a925f068d8a7d5f084f2ea77847e40cbc4b52dd87ae8559984e68654c834 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

stage · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.