Paper · 2017 · Journal of Hill Agriculture

Effect of foliar sprays of micronutrients on plant growth and yield of lentil under rainfed condition of Uttarakhand hills

HR Ranjithkumar; Ajay Kumar; Bhim Jyoti; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2015–16 at VCSG Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India to study the effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of lentil (Var VL 126) under rainfed conditions of Uttarakhand hills. The experiment consisted of eight treatments viz. T0-RDF (N: P: K-20: 40: 20 kg ha-1), T1-RDF+ Zn 50 ppm, T2-RDF+ Zn 100 ppm, T3-RDF+ Fe 50 ppm, T4-RDF+ Fe 100 ppm, T5-RDF+ B 50 ppm, T6-RDF+ B 100 ppm and T7-RDF+ Zn+ Fe+ B (50 ppm each) laid out in randomized block design with three replications. The data indicated that RDF+ Fe 50 ppm recorded significantly higher plant height, plant spread and number of nodules per plant. Seed yield was recorded maximum under RDF+ Fe 50 ppm which was statistically on par with RDF+ B 50 ppm. There was 33% increase in seed yield in RDF+ Fe 50 ppm than the RDF. B: C ratio also registered maximum in RDF+ Fe 50 ppm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus Fe 50 ppm gave significantly higher lentil height and spread.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Material
Var VL 126e1
Treatment
RDF+ Fe 50 ppme0
Outcome
plant height, plant spreade0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF+ Fe 50 ppm recorded significantly higher plant height, plant spread and number of nodules per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–708 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Var VL 126)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus Fe 50 ppm gave significantly more nodules per lentil plant.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Material
Var VL 126e1
Treatment
RDF+ Fe 50 ppme0
Outcome
number of nodules per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF+ Fe 50 ppm recorded significantly higher plant height, plant spread and number of nodules per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–708 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Var VL 126)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield was highest with RDF plus Fe 50 ppm.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
RDF+ Fe 50 ppme0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield was recorded maximum under RDF+ Fe 50 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Var VL 126)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil seed yield under RDF plus Fe 50 ppm was statistically on par with RDF plus B 50 ppm.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
RDF+ Fe 50 ppme0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
statistically on pare0
Comparator
RDF+ B 50 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield was recorded maximum under RDF+ Fe 50 ppm which was statistically on par with RDF+ B 50 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Var VL 126)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus Fe 50 ppm increased lentil seed yield by 33% relative to RDF.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
RDF+ Fe 50 ppme0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
the RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 33% increase in seed yield in RDF+ Fe 50 ppm than the RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Var VL 126)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus Fe 50 ppm gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
RDF+ Fe 50 ppme0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B: C ratio also registered maximum in RDF+ Fe 50 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Var VL 126)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–235 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.