Abstract
Field trial was conducted to optimize the micronutrient application in lentil crop (Variety-WBL-77) at Regional Research Station (Old Alluvial Zone), Uttar BangaKrishi Viswavidyalaya, Majhian during 2019-20 and 2020-21. Foliar application of Fe, Zn and B (at 50 and 100 ppm each) were applied twice, first at pre anthesis stage and second at pod development stage. Parameters such as plant height (cm), dry matter (g/m2), number of nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were observed highest with T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) treatment whereas the T1 (RDF) showed the lowest value for each parameter. T3 (RDF+100 ppm Zn foliar spray) resulted with maximum 1000 seed weight (g). T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) was also recorded with the highest seed yield (kg/ha), stover yield (kg/ha). Both T7 (RDF+100 ppm B foliar spray) and T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) treatments were resulted with the same value of harvest index followed by the rest of the treatments. Therefore, the treatment T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) proved best among the treatments selected and can be recommended for lentil (Variety-WBL-77).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave the highest plant height (cm) and T1 the lowest.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- plant height (cm)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- T1 (RDF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“Parameters such as plant height (cm), dry matter (g/m2), number of nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were observed highest with T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) treatment whereas the T1 (RDF) showed the lowest value for each parameter”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave the highest dry matter (g/m2) and T1 the lowest.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- dry matter (g/m2)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- T1 (RDF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“Parameters such as plant height (cm), dry matter (g/m2), number of nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were observed highest with T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) treatment whereas the T1 (RDF) showed the lowest value for each parameter”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave the highest number of nodules per plant and T1 the lowest.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- number of nodules per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- T1 (RDF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“Parameters such as plant height (cm), dry matter (g/m2), number of nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were observed highest with T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) treatment whereas the T1 (RDF) showed the lowest value for each parameter”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave the highest number of pods per plant and T1 the lowest.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- T1 (RDF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“Parameters such as plant height (cm), dry matter (g/m2), number of nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were observed highest with T8(RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) treatment whereas the T1 (RDF) showed the lowest value for each parameter”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 yielded maximum 1000 seed weight.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T3 (RDF+100 ppm Zn foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- 1000 seed weight (g)e0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“T3 (RDF+100 ppm Zn foliar spray) resulted with maximum 1000 seed weight (g)”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest seed yield (kg/ha).
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- seed yield (kg/ha)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) was also recorded with the highest seed yield (kg/ha), stover yield (kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest stover yield (kg/ha).
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- stover yield (kg/ha)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) was also recorded with the highest seed yield (kg/ha), stover yield (kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 and T8 had the same harvest index, ahead of the other treatments.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- T7 (RDF+100 ppm B foliar spray) and T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- same valuee0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“Both T7 (RDF+100 ppm B foliar spray) and T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) treatments were resulted with the same value of harvest index followed by the rest of the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend T8 for lentil.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Material
- Variety-WBL-77e0
- Outcome
- T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil”
e0“the treatment T8 (RDF+50 ppm Zn+Fe+B foliar spray) proved best among the treatments selected and can be recommended for lentil (Variety-WBL-77)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →iron atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →iron atom · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
iron atom · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc atom · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →zinc atom · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →application · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.